Neil Parish did the right thing by resigning – but the bar is low

Letters to the editor: our readers share their views. Please send your letters to letters@independent.co.uk

Sunday 01 May 2022 15:58 BST
Comments
It’s a sad day when we are so feebly grateful for his actions because they are set against the brass neck of Boris Johnson’s typical delay tactics
It’s a sad day when we are so feebly grateful for his actions because they are set against the brass neck of Boris Johnson’s typical delay tactics (UK parliament/AFP via Getty)

Neil Parish did indeed do the right thing, as Sean O’Grady writes.

However, it’s a sad day when we are so feebly grateful for his actions because they are set against the obfuscation, deviation and brass neck of Boris Johnson’s typical delay tactics.

Iain Boyd

Bristol

Which is the greater sin? Is it watching pornography in the House of Commons followed by honourable resignation? Or is it lying to the house but refusing to resign?

The first dishonours the house. The second dishonours the country.

David Lee

Kingston upon Thames

Westminster drinking culture

Ex-MP Mark Oaten spoke on Stephen Nolan’s Radio 5 Live show on Friday. He left Westminster in disgrace, something he fully accepted in the conversation.

He spoke about the drinking culture, which has been repeated ad nauseam, plus the ridiculously long hours. He suggested removing alcohol and creating a 9am till 6pm working day. Doesn’t it sound simple?

MPs have to live in London for the week, travel up on a Monday morning and return home on Thursday, but the baffling part of this arrangement is that the taxpayer pays for a week’s accommodation, which is only used for three nights.

The government likes to talk about regional hubs. This might be the answer to the present nonsense.

Martin Spittle

Norfolk

To keep up to speed with all the latest opinions and comment, sign up to our free weekly Voices Dispatches newsletter by clicking here

Loud vehicles

I am pleased that the government may be waking up to the nuisance caused by noisy vehicles.

I have never understood why steps have not long ago been taken to limit the noisiness of the vehicles on our roads. If this can be done at the roadside, which would necessarily be serendipitous, why not make it a part of the MOT and the initial design requirements?

There are some motorcyclists who actually seem to enjoy making a lot of noise, and I have never understood why we accept that a vehicle capable of carrying up to two people may be noisier than one that can carry up to five.

Dennis Leachman

Kingston upon Thames

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in