Covid inquiry live: Priti Patel admits policing of Sarah Everard vigil was ‘totally inappropriate’
Ex-home secretary says police generally struck right balance between protest and Covid restrictions
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Dame Priti Patel has admitted to the Covid inquiry that the policing of a vigil for murdered marketing executive Sarah Everard was “totally inappropriate”.
The former home secretary said she was “dismayed” by the policing of the vigil in early 2021. The Metropolitan Police have since apologised and paid damages to two of those who were arrested.
However, Dame Priti said she felt the police generally struck the right balance between enforcing coronavirus restrictions and upholding people’s right to protest – despite such matters feeling “uncomfortable” at the time.
Earlier today, former top police chief Martin Hewitt criticised localised Covid rules, the speed at which they changed, and the tier system of different regulations for different areas of the country.
He told the inquiry that localised tiers made it “incredibly difficult for even a perfectly law-abiding and committed citizen to understand precisely what that meant for them in their own personal circumstances”, while having different regulations “on opposite sides of the same road” made policing more difficult.
Jun Pang, the policy and campaigns officer at Liberty, is also giving evidence to the inquiry.
Boris Johnson’s half term break was ‘regrettable’, Lord Sedwill
The former cabinet secretary said Boris Johnson’s break from February 10 to February 24 2020 was “regrettable”, as the former PM was not receiving information about the unfolding pandemic, Archie Mitchell reports.
Lord Sedwill said he “would have expected” work at the top of government on Covid to continue.
Boris Johnson said ‘confidence is contagious’ at February 2020 cabinet meeting
Boris Johnson said confidence was “contagious” too as he urged ministers to project a sense of calm and control at the start of the pandemic, Archie Mitchell reports.
At a cabinet meeting on February 6, 2020, Johnson cautioned against overreacting to the spread of the pandemic and the “economic damage” that would cause, the Covid inquiry has heard.
Minutes of the meeting shown to the probe show the former PM said “confidence is contagious” and stressed the importance of government “remaining measured” in its response.
The minutes read that health secretary Matt Hancock had “taken the right tone”, adding: “Often the significant economic damage of a crisis came from political overreaction rather than the problem itself. This had been true of Bovine spongiform encephalopathy.”
Lord Sedwill worried about ‘stupid’ decisions being taken during pandemic
Lord Sedwill believed the government risked taking “stupid” decisions based on projections about the potential for 600,000 Covid deaths, Archie Mitchell reports.
In an exchange of messages with the permanent secretary of the Department of Health Chris Wormald, the former cabinet secretary said the figure touted by Dominic Cummings at a meeting in February 2020 was “twice the number” he had been given.
Sir Chris cited chief medical officer Sir Chris Whitty saying the reasonable worst case scenario was one for between 100,000 and 300,000 excess deaths.
“We almost ended up with stupid decisions being taken in an informal meeting,” Lord Sedwill fumed.
Cabinet meeting on February 4, 2020 only heard ‘short update’ on Covid
A cabinet meeting on February 4, 2020 heard only a “short update” on Covid, despite the unfolding crisis, the Covid inquiry has heard, Archie Mitchell reports.
Lord Sedwill said at that time the probability of the worst-case scenario unfolding was about 10 per cent, and the “seriousness of the crisis was not apparent”.
Sedwill: Covid plans should have been interrogated as pandemic struck
Lord Sedwill has said ministers were repeatedly assured “plans were in place” to manage the pandemic as it emerged, but in hindsight they should have been “interrogated more carefully”, Archie Mitchell reports.
The former cabinet secretary told the Covid inquiry said he “presumed” that plans for isolating the most vulnerable would have been in place from a flu pandemic exercise in 2016.
“But I did not interrogate that,” Lord Sedwill said.
He added that the capability to stop Covid entering UK “did not exist” as pandemic struck
Lord Sedwill said that government officials knew in January that if Covid left China it would lead to a crisis in the United Kingdom.
But the former cabinet secretary said the capability to stop the virus entering the UK “did not exist”.
Russian-backed politician in Ukraine killed in car bomb - report
A car bomb has killed a Russian-backed politician in Ukraine’s eastern region of Luhansk, local media reports.
Mikhail Filiponenko was a former head of the Luhansk local militia, the Moscow-backed separatist army that had been fighting against Kyiv since 2014.
“As a result of an explosive device that detonated in Mikhail Filiponenko’s car, the People’s Council deputy received injuries incompatible with life,” his son told the Luhansk Information Centre.
Sedwill: I was concerned Hancock called Cobra to ‘make a splash’
Lord Sedwill did not accept a request to convene a Cobra meeting in January 2020 because he did not want to “unnerve” the public, Archie Mitchell reports.
The former cabinet secretary told the Covid inquiry he was made aware of the virus on January 21 that year and then received a request from the Department of Health to convene the emergency committee.
But he said at the time the government’s communications approach was to “try and maintain calm in its public communications” and the meeting could have been “unnerving”.
He added that he was concerned the Cobra meeting was being convened to “make a splash” about the role of the Department of Health and the health secretary Matt Hancock”.
Johnson government was ‘more like opposition party coming to power’
Boris Johnson’s government before the pandemic was “more like an opposition party coming to power… than a government that had been in power for 10 years”, Lord Sedwill has said, Archie Mitchell reports.
The former cabinet secretary told the Covid inquiry that was due to the nature of the Brexit process and the “change in personalities Mr Johnson brought in”.
The “primary focus” of January 2020 was Brexit, Lord Sedwill added, after which Mr Johnson’s focus turned to delivering on his manifesto commitments.
Sedwill: Johnson had to reminded to include cabinet in decision-making
Former cabinet secretary Lord Mark Sedwill had to remind Boris Johnson to include his cabinet in decision-making over concerns the top ministers were being sidelined.
Lord Sedwill told the Covid inquiry he did not believe the cabinet was being as “fully participative” in key decisions.
“I did need to remind him of the importance of involving cabinet colleagues not just in the formal decision but formulation of that decision,” he said.
Sedwill: access to record-keeping ‘troublesome’
Mark Sedwill said that record keeping during the Covid pandemic and access to those records had been “troublesome”.
“The record keeping and the access to records has been troublesome,” he said.
He did, however, say that he had access to a “range of material” and had to identify what was important from this.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments