Covid inquiry live: Priti Patel admits policing of Sarah Everard vigil was ‘totally inappropriate’
Ex-home secretary says police generally struck right balance between protest and Covid restrictions
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Dame Priti Patel has admitted to the Covid inquiry that the policing of a vigil for murdered marketing executive Sarah Everard was “totally inappropriate”.
The former home secretary said she was “dismayed” by the policing of the vigil in early 2021. The Metropolitan Police have since apologised and paid damages to two of those who were arrested.
However, Dame Priti said she felt the police generally struck the right balance between enforcing coronavirus restrictions and upholding people’s right to protest – despite such matters feeling “uncomfortable” at the time.
Earlier today, former top police chief Martin Hewitt criticised localised Covid rules, the speed at which they changed, and the tier system of different regulations for different areas of the country.
He told the inquiry that localised tiers made it “incredibly difficult for even a perfectly law-abiding and committed citizen to understand precisely what that meant for them in their own personal circumstances”, while having different regulations “on opposite sides of the same road” made policing more difficult.
Jun Pang, the policy and campaigns officer at Liberty, is also giving evidence to the inquiry.
Sedwill: ‘It took Boris Johnson a long time to recover from Covid'
Lord Sedwill has told the Covid inquiry it took Boris Johnson a “long time” to recover from his bout with Covid, Archie Mitchell reports.
The former cabinet secretary said he was concerned about the then prime minister’s “stamina”.
He said Mr Johnson’s “decision-making style”, having been repeatedly compared to a veering trolley during the inquiry, was “a separate question”.
Inquiry counsel Hugo Keith KC promised “we will come back to that”.
Better structure of Department of Health would have provided ‘alternative to lockdown’, inquiry hears
If the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) had been better structured and resourced for a public health crisis, the UK could have had an alternative to locking down during the pandemic, Lord Sedwill has said, Archie Mitchell reports.
One example the former cabinet secretary put forward is contact tracing capabilities, which would have provided “more options” at the beginning of the pandemic.
Sedwill: ‘I was not wedded to herd immunity'
Lord Sedwill has denied he was “wedded” to the government’s initial herd immunity strategy to tackle Covid, Archie Mitchell reports.
The former cabinet secretary was asked whether he was “unimpressed” by the government’s decision to introduce measures attempting to control the pandemic.
“I was not wedded to it,” Lord Sedwill said. “The government had no choice but to accelerate into these measures,” he added.
An earlier lockdown could have been shorter
Lord Sedwill has told the Covid inquiry an earlier lockdown could have resulted in a shorter lockdown overall, Archie Mitchell reports.
“Earlier would have been better.” the former cabinet secretary said.
He was asked about Boris Johnson’s March 16, 2020 statement, asking people to avoid pubs and clubs and work from home, and whether if it was given earlier a national lockdown could have been avoided.
Lord Sedwill said: “I am highly sceptical that it would have been possible to avoid the lockdown altogether.
“It might well have been possible for it to have been less prolonged.”
Lord Sedwill gave Sir Patrick Vallance ‘an evil eye’
Lord Sedwill gave Sir Patrick Vallance “an evil eye” in a meeting in which the then chief scientific adviser urged an acceleration of the government’s approach to the pandemic, Archie Mitchell reports.
The former cabinet secretary said he did “not remember being furious” and Sir Patrick did not tell him at the time he had “pulled a face”.
But diary entries by Sir Patrick, submitted to the Covid inquiry, said at a meeting on March 15, 2020, Lord Sedwill was “furious, gave him a very sour look or tentatively gave him an evil eye”.
Sedwill: My chickenpox comment wasn’t intended to downplay seriousess of Covid
Lord Sedwill has said he did not believe Covid was only as serious as chickenpox and “knew it was a much more serious disease”, Archie Mitchell reports.
The former cabinet secretary has come under fire during the Covid inquiry for advising the prime minister to “explain that this is like the old days with chickenpox and people are going to have chickenpox parties”.
Asked about his stance, Lord Sedwill said: “That was not the point I was trying to make. As soon as I realised… I dropped it, because I realised the analogy was causing confusion.”
Lord Sedwill said: “I understand how… it must have come across that someone in my role was both heartless and thoughtless about this.
“I genuinely am neither. But I do understand the distress that must have caused and I apologise for that because it certainly wouldn’t have been my intention.”.
Lord Sedwill did not want decisions taken by ‘a bunch of No10 Spads’
Lord Sedwill accused Boris Johnson’s government of acting like a “dictatorship” and railed against key decisions being taken by “a bunch of No10 Spads”, Archie Mitchell reports.
The former PM’s top adviser Dominic Cummings tried to convene a meeting chaired by himself and Mr Johnson’s comms chief Lee Cain in March 2020 to “bring key players together”.
But, responding to the email shown to the Covid inquiry, the former cabinet secretary Lord Sedwill said: “We are not running a dictatorship here and the PM is not taking nationally significant decisions with a bunch of number 10 Spads and no ministers, no operational experts and no scientists.
“If necessary. I will take over the 8.15am slot and chair a daily meeting myself.”
Government’s emergency planning arm ‘could not cope’ with Covid
Lord Sedwill has accepted the government’s emergency planning body could not cope with the “once in a century” pandemic which Covid represented, Archie Mitchell reports.
The former cabinet secretary told the Covid inquiry the pandemic was “a wholly different magnitude” and was beyond the capacity of the Civil Contingencies Secretariat (CCS).
Inquiry counsel Hugo Keith KC questioned why it was not prepared, given one of its own “tier one” risks was a “serious pandemic” causing as many as 820,000 deaths.
“They didn’t have the capacity to deal with this on their own at this scale,” Lord Sedwill said.
Lord Sedwill: Control of Covid had been ‘lost’ by the time March 3 plan was published
Lord Sedwill has said control of the virus had been “lost” by the time a Covid action plan was published by the Department of Health on March 3, Archie Mitchell reports.
The plan set out the UK’s contain, delay and mitigate approach to the pandemic. But inquiry counsel Hugo Keith KC asked if the former cabinet secretary would accept that control had already been lost by then.
Lord Sedwill said: “We didn’t understand that at the time but, and indeed, that wasn’t the advice I think Sage gave us at the time.” But given what officials then discovered, “that is a fact”, Lord Sedwill added.
Elements of government believed pandemic ‘wasn’t going to happen’ inquiry hears
The Covid inquiry has heard officials at the top of government believed the Covid pandemic was “not going to happen” and that there “was optimism bias”, Archie Mitchell reports.
Former cabinet secretary Lord Sedwill was asked by inquiry lead counsel Hugo Keith KC whether, as previous witnesses have suggested, “elements of the government just believed it wasn’t going to happen, that there was optimism bias”.
Lord Sedwill said that is a “fair” way of putting it.
He added: “It’s hard looking back to recall quite how extraordinary were the measures we later took, they were unconscionable at the time.
“And therefore I think your point about this instinctive human reaction is true.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments