House of Commons Syria debate - as it happened: Jeremy Corbyn secures emergency debate on UK military action
PM denies following Donald Trump's lead by launching air strikes
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Theresa May has faced MPs to defend her decision to launch air strikes against the Syrian government, but ducked calls to give parliament a retrospective vote on the matter.
Speaking in the House of Commons, the prime minister dismissed suggestions the government had followed the “whims” of Donald Trump and insisted she had taken the decision to launch strikes because it was in the UK's national interest.
But she faced criticism from MPs, including some on her own benches, for not seeking a vote of parliament before launching the strikes.
Instead, the Commons is likely to vote on the issue on Tuesday after Jeremy Corbyn was granted permission for a debate on intervention in Syria.
Please allow a moment for the live blog to load
The SNP's Westminster leader Ian Blackford asks the Prime Minister why Parliament was not recalled when she summoned her emergency Cabinet last week.
He says he's glad Corbyn is supporting the SNPs call for a War Powers Act. He says there's no long-term strategic plan.
Labour's former shadow foreign secretary hits out the PM for not consulting Parliament before striking the Syrian regime.
Here's a clip of the Tory MP Ken Clarke making a similar point earlier:
Liz Kendal is the first Labour MP that has broke with the Labour frontbench, saying that Assad's use of chemical weapons cannot go unanswered.
Labour MP Chris Leslie also criticised those who "turn a blind eye" and favour inaction - a thinly veiled criticism of his party leader.
He said: "Pinpointing and degrading Assad's chemical weapons was necessary and appropriate, and that intervening to save civilians from future gas attacks - while not without risk - was absolutely the right thing to do.
"Would the Prime Minister also agree that a policy of inaction also would have severe consequences, and that those who would turn a blind eye, who would do nothing in pursuit of some moral high ground should also be held accountable - for once - today as well?"
Mrs May replied: "I agree with him. Many people focus on the impact of action but actually inaction would have given a message that these chemical weapons could continue to be used by the Syrian regime and indeed by others with impunity and we cannot allow that to happen."
Ben Bradshaw, another Labour MP, says Assad and his regime have "lied, and lied again". But he also urges her to come to Parliament and seek consent for military intervention in future instances.
Tory former attorney general Dominic Grieve said: "If the leader of the opposition persists on behalf of the Labour Party in changing its previous adherence to the previous rule of international law justifying taking unilateral action in the event of there being a humanitarian necessity, does (Mrs May) agree with me that the consequence of that is going to be that any tyrant, megalomaniac, person intent on carrying out genocide, if they have the support of an amoral state within the Security Council would be able to conduct that genocide with total impunity even if it was within our power to act to prevent it?
"And does she agree with me that in those circumstances, far from upholding the international rules-based system, the reality is that it would be dead?"
Labour backbencher Chris Bryant says "the most pernicious role in Syria has been played by Russia: they have systematically refused to allow people to investigate where war crimes have been committed, they've advanced their own territorial ambitions, and we must make sure that they pay the price in the end".
Theresa May says he is "absolutely right", adding that Russia has been "unwilling" to help negotiate a political and diplomatic settlement in Syria and has "supported a regime which has illegally used chemical weapons to kill and to injure its own civilians, including young children".
Labour's Jess Phillips urges MPs to "have better faith in each other", saying: "This is not an opportunity for politics about the local elections - this is about children being gassed.
"On both sides I have heard ridiculous politicking and bad faith," she adds.
She says Theresa May should have given MPs a vote before launching strikes, but says she would have voted in support of military action.
Theresa May has now been taking questions from MPs for over two hours. Most have expressed support for her actions, although some on both sides of the House said the prime minister should have consulted Parliament first. A small number of SNP and Labour MPs have also criticised the action, asking how it will help end the conflict in Syria.
When questions end, there will be a debate on the UK's actions in Syria. Theresa May is expected to wrap up on behalf of the government.
A slightly strange intervention from Tory MP Steve Double, who calls himself a "humble backbencher" and thanks Theresa May "for not putting the responsibility on me for making this decision without having the full information and intelligence that was available to her".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments