Russia-US tensions: Cabinet gives May the go-ahead for Syria strike 'to deter further use of chemical weapons by the Assad regime'
Donald Trump is yet to take a 'final decision' on what action the US will take according to the White House
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Theresa May's cabinet has agreed on the need to "take action" to deter use of chemical weapons following an emergency meeting at Downing Street.
The prime minister summoned her senior ministers to No 10 to discuss joining the United States and France in possible military strikes against Syria after saying “all the indications” were Bashar al-Assad's was responsible for a suspected nerve agent attack on civilians last weekend.
President Donald Trump had warned Russia of imminent military action in Syria, declaring missiles “will be coming” and denouncing Moscow for standing by Syria’s president, but on Thursday night the White House said that "no final decision" had been made about what Washington will do.
Mr Trump, Ms May and French President Emmanuel Macron have been in regular contact as they plot a course of action, with Mr Macron saying France has "proof" the Syrian government carried out the chemical attack which killed potentially doxens.
It followed the Kremlin's insistence that it would shoot down any missiles and attack their source, in developments that have placed the two global and nuclear superpowers closer to open conflict than at any time since the Cold War.
Our live coverage has ended for now - but read a full account of the day's events in the blog below. Please allow a few seconds for it to load.
Russia has repeatedly warned the West against attacking the infrastructure of Syria's government and army, which is also supported by Iran.
Moscow has said there was no chemical attack in Douma, near the capital Damascus.
Ms May recalled the ministers from their Easter holiday for a special cabinet meeting in Downing Street to discuss Britain’s response to what she has cast as a barbaric attack which cannot go unchallenged.
“The chemical weapons attack that took place on Saturday in Douma in Syria was a shocking and barbaric act,” Ms May said. “All the indications are that the Syrian regime was responsible.”
The Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) had said it intends to send investigators to Douma to look for any evidence of a chemical attack.
Ms May has faced calls to wait for unequivocal proof of a chemical attack by the Assad regime before committing British forces to retaliatory action.
The Labour leader, Jeremy Corbyn, joined other opposition parties, as well as some Conservative backbenchers, in insisting MPs must be have a say on any British involvement in military action.
However, Ms May faces growing impatience from Washington, after Mr Trump's tweet to say the missiles “will be coming”.
The prime minister is not obliged to win parliament’s approval, but a non-binding constitutional convention to do so has been established since a 2003 vote on joining the US-led invasion of Iraq.
It has been observed in subsequent military deployments in Libya and Iraq.
Britain has been launching air strikes in Syria from its military base in Cyprus, but only against targets linked to Isis.
Parliament voted down British military action against Mr Assad’s government in 2013, in an embarrassment for David Cameron.
The vote deterred Barack Obama’s administration from similar action.
Additional reporting by agencies
Diane Abbott, Labour's shadow home secretary, has said it would be "outrageous to bomb Syria without a vote in Parliament."
"The convention that, Parliament must vote before putting our troops in harms way, should not be abandoned," she said.
Donald Trump has said he "never said when an attack on Syria would take place."
The US president tweeted to say an attack could be "very soon or not so soon at all!"
His tweet said: "Never said when an attack on Syria would take place. Could be very soon or not so soon at all! In any event, the United States, under my Administration, has done a great job of ridding the region of Isis. Where is our "Thank you America?'"
Jeremy Corbyn has condemned Donald Trump's fiery rhetoric on Syria and said: "More bombing, more killing, more war will not save life."
The Labour leader was asked about the US president's tweet yesterday in which he said "nice and new and 'smart!"' missiles would soon be fired toward Syria.
Mr Corbyn said: "I think the whole world should be alarmed at that sort of instant reaction - sending stuff out on social media to make policy.
"What happened in Syria is disgraceful. Any use of chemical weapons by anybody against anybody else is clearly illegal as well as immoral and wrong.
"The United Nations has a duty and a function to ensure there's a proper investigation undertaken as the inspectors are now in Douma doing just that and, when we've got the results of that, decide what action to take.
"But, I would just say this. Hundreds of thousands have died and lost their lives in Syria.
"Millions have been forced into refuge. Many are living in terrible poverty and desperation. There has to be a political solution.
"Russia, America, the European Union, all the neighbouring countries, Iran, Saudia Arabia have got to be involved in ensuring there is a real ceasefire and a political process that does give hope to the people of Syria in the future.
"More bombing, more killing, more war will not save life. It will just take more lives and spawn the war elsewhere."
Jeremy Corbyn also demanded MPs be consulted before the UK joined any attack on Syria.
"Parliament must be consulted on this," he said.
"Surely the lessons of Iraq, the lessons that came there from the Chilcott Report, are that there's got to be, there has to be a proper process of consultation.
"We elect Parliament, we elect Members of Parliament.
"They should have a voice in this. Cabinet on its own should not be making this decision.
"I do urge people to look again at what Chilcott said about the evidence that was presented and the arguments that were presented.
"I want to see the whole picture on this because I want to see peace in Syria.
"I want to see an end to the war in Syria.
"That does mean America and Russia holding back, pulling back and talking to each other.
"The dangers of bombing now, which could escalate the conflict beyond belief. Just imagine the scenario if an American missile shoots down a Russian plane or vice versa. Where do we go from there?
"Surely, if we've learned nothing from the last 50 years of Cold War and the proxy wars since then [it is] the dangers of that."
When he was asked whether he opposed military action in Syria under any circumstances, Mr Corbyn said: "I'm not in favour of increasing military action in Syria, what I'm in favour of is a political process to bring about peace."
He added: "Assad should be dealt with by international law; by sanctions, if necessary; by the United Nations, but, also, by pressure from those countries that have supported him and those countries that have supported the opposition - to halt the conflict, to bring about a solution that does recognise the rights of the diversity of the people in Syria. The Kurdish people and others have got to have their say in how this process works out."
Emmanuel Macron has said France has "proof" chemical weapons were used by the Syrian regime.
The French president said he will make the decision on whether to strike Syria when the time comes.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments