Syria strikes - as it happened: Bashar al-Assad's chemical weapons capability 'set back for years' by bombing, Pentagon says
Theresa May warns of further strikes if regime uses poison again
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Joint air strikes by the US, UK and France have set back Syria’s chemical weapons capability “for years”, the US military said.
Cruise missiles were fired at three sites in response to what Theresa May called the “despicable and barbaric” attack in Douma last week that is believed to have killed up to 75 people.
Ms May said Bashar al-Assad could face even further strikes if chemical weapons are used again - and the US warned that they were "locked and loaded" if poison used again.
US President Donald Trump declared “mission accomplished” after more than 100 missiles were collectively launched in the early hours of the morning.
During telephone conversations on Saturday afternoon, Ms May, Mr Trump and Emmanuel Macron all agreed that the military strikes in Syria "had been a success".
Downing Street published a document setting out why it believes military action against the Syrian regime was legal after Jeremy Corbyn described the action as legally questionable.
The Russian embassy in the US said it had warned that such actions would "not be left without consequences", adding that insulting President Vladimir Putin was "unacceptable and inadmissible".
Please allow a moment for the live blog to load
Russia and Syria claimed most of the missiles, numbering about 110, were intercepted, while the Pentagon said Syrian defences had “no effect” on the operation.
Mr Assad, backed also by Iran, said on Saturday the bombings would increase his country’s resolve to “fight and crush terrorism”.
Ms May said she had authorised British forces to conduct precision strikes against Syria to help degrade its chemical weapons capability.
“This is not about intervening in a civil war. It is not about regime change,” Ms May said in a statement. “It is about a limited and targeted strike that does not further escalate tensions in the region and that does everything possible to prevent civilian casualties.”
RAF Tornado jets bombed a chemical weapons facility 15 miles outside Homs, the Ministry of Defence said.
Russia warned of “consequences” for the US-led military strikes, saying the use of missiles on suspected chemical weapons assets were an insult to Vladimir Putin.
“A pre-designed scenario is being implemented,” Russian ambassador Anatoly Antonov said in a statement. “Again, we are being threatened. We warned that such actions will not be left without consequences.”
Earlier, Russia’s military claimed to have evidence that Britain had “direct involvement” in staging the suspected chemical attack in Syria, a charge quickly condemned as “grotesque” by the UK.
Humanitarian volunteers were “seriously pressured” by the UK to speed up plans for a “provocation” in eastern Ghouta, Moscow’s defence ministry suggested.
Britain’s ambassador to the UN condemned the “blatant lie” as “the worst piece of fake news we’ve yet seen from the Russian propaganda machine”.
Later, a spokesman for the UK Foreign Office said: “These accusations from Moscow are just the latest in a number of ludicrous allegations from Russia, who have also said that no attack ever happened.
“This simply shows their desperation to pin the blame on anyone but their client: the [President Bashar] Assad regime
It comes as Russia and the United States traded fresh blows during the latest round of talks at the UN Security Council and amid warnings that the world is at risk of “full-blown military escalation”.
The State Department said the United States has proof at “a very high level of confidence” that the Syrian government of Mr Assad carried out the attack but is still working to identify the mix of chemicals used.
“Syria is responsible. We are all in agreement,” department spokeswoman Heather Nauert told reporters.
Additional reporting by agencies
Good morning, welcome to The Independent's live blog on the mounting tensions surrounding the crisis in Syria.
Theresa May and Donald Trump have agreed the use of chemical weapons must not go unchallenged after the prime minister won the backing of her cabinet on the need to "take action" to prevent their further use by the regime of Bashar al-Assad.
Meanwhile, Russia has been granted a request for the United Nations Security Council to meet on Friday for fresh discussions on Syria.
Jeremy Corbyn has accused the Government of 'waiting for instructions' from Donald Trump on what to do over Syria.
The Labour leader said: "Further UK military intervention in Syria's appalling multi-sided war risks escalating an already devastating conflict.
"The Government appears to be waiting for instructions from President Donald Trump on how to proceed. But the US administration is giving alarmingly contradictory signals.
"Even US defence secretary James Mattis has said we 'don't have evidence' and warned further military action could 'escalate out of control'."
Mr Corbyn added: "Ministers should take their proposals, such as they are, to parliament. And Britain should press for an independent UN-led investigation of last weekend's horrific chemical weapons attack so that those responsible can be held to account.
"Rather than further military action, what is urgently needed is a coordinated international drive to achieve a ceasefire and a negotiated settlement under UN auspices. The humanitarian priority must be to halt the killing on all sides.
"The need to restart genuine negotiations for peace and an inclusive political settlement of the Syrian conflict, including the withdrawal of all foreign forces, could not be more urgent. We must do everything we can, no matter how challenging, to bring that about."
Labour's shadow home secretary, Diane Abbott, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "It would be outrageous for the government not to bring military action in Syria to Parliament, for Parliament to have a vote. And the Tories used to think like that.
"The reason they are not doing it is they are frightened they will lose the vote."
Pressed on whether there were any circumstances in which Labour would back military action in Syria, Ms Abbott said: "What we are interested in is an end to the violence and we don't believe that further bombing, in this situation, will bring an end to the violence."
When she was asked if Russia or the US posed the greatest threat to world peace, Ms Abbott said: "It's clear that at this point Russia, its role in Syria, what we believe, beyond reasonable doubt, is its role in the poison gas attacks in Salisbury, is a greater threat to world peace than the United States."
Referring to Donald Trump's tweets, Russia's deputy prime minister said international relations should not depend on the mood of one person when he wakes up in the morning, the RIA news agency reported.
Arkady Dvorkovich said Russia was not prepared for such risks.
Hezbollah, an Iran-backed Islamist militant group, does not believe a direct US-Russia clash or wider all-out war will occur over Syria, its deputy leader said in a newspaper interview published on Friday.
Sheikh Naim Qassem told Lebanese daily al-Joumhouria: "The conditions do not point to a total war happening... unless Trump and Netanyahu completely lose their minds," referring to Donald Trump and Israel's prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu.
Here are the full quotes from Russia's deputy prime minister, Arkady Dvorkovich, who said international relations should not depend on the mood of one person when he wakes up in the morning, in apparent reference to President Trump.
"We cannot depend on the mood of someone on the other side of the ocean when he wakes up, on what a specific person takes into his head in the morning," Mr Dvorkovich said, according to the TASS news agency.
"We cannot take such risks."
In an early-morning tweet on Wednesday, Mr Trump warned missiles "will be coming" in response to a suspected chemical weapons attack by Syrian government forces. Russia is Syria's most important military ally in the country's civil war.
In another tweet on Thursday, Mr Trump appeared to cast doubt on at least the timing of any US-led military action. "Never said when an attack on Syria would take place. Could be very soon or not so soon at all!" it said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments