Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Melbourne surgeon sued for failing to tell patient he used ‘experimental’ jaw device

Patient claims Dr George Dimitroulis did not tell her surgery might not work or it could leave her jaw condition worse

Maroosha Muzaffar
Monday 05 August 2024 13:23 BST
Comments
Representational image
Representational image (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.

Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.

Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election

Head shot of Andrew Feinberg

Andrew Feinberg

White House Correspondent

A Melbourne surgeon has been sued for negligence by a patient who claimed that he did not inform her of his “experimental” jaw device during surgery.

Dr George Dimitroulis is facing a lawsuit from a former patient who says he did not fully disclose the risks associated with her 2018 jaw surgery or reveal that the device, called OMX prosthesis, was experimental.

The patient has claimed that Dr Dimitroulis used a classification system he created to diagnose her condition as severe enough to require surgery. She claimed this system was not widely used by other surgeons and that less invasive treatments were available.

The unidentified patient has also alleged that the surgery resulted in chronic pain and inability to work, The Guardian reported.

Dr Dimitroulis, in his defence filed on 16 July, has denied the allegations and said that he followed accepted medical practices and discussed known risks with the patient.

“At all relevant times he acted in a manner that was widely accepted in Australia by a significant number of respected practitioners as competent professional practice,” his lawyer’s statement said.

An amended statement of claim filed on 21 June by law firm Slater & Gordon on behalf of the patient said Dr Dimitroulis wrote a research paper proposing a new classification system for diagnosing temporomandibular joint, or TMJ, disorders to determine which patients required surgery for it.

The paper was published in the International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery in 2013.

The claim alleged that the doctor used his classification system to diagnose the patient and suggested surgery as the only option available to her.

The patient has claimed that Dr Dimitroulis did not inform her that the surgery might not work or that it could leave her jaw condition worse.

The claims have been denied by the doctor’s defence team.

Dr Dimitroulis is described on his website as a “globally recognised surgeon and author” who “has been invited all over the world as a guest and keynote speaker by various national and international organisations spanning five continents to present topics ranging from TMJ surgery to surgical research”.

It notes that “he is the inventor of almost a dozen groundbreaking craniomaxillofacial medical devices including the TMJ Arthrojaw and Osseoframe”.

The Independent has reached out to Dr Dimitroulis for comment.

According to Medical News Today, “Temporomandibular joint disorder surgery can reduce pain and improve jaw functioning” but “doctors use this treatment as a last resort because there’s a lack of research on its safety and effectiveness”.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in