Texas town continues to demand $500,000 from Trump four years after hosting rally
The City of El Paso has sent an “updated invoice statement” to the Trump campaign that includes a one-time delinquency charge of $98,787.58
Your support helps us to tell the story
As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.
Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.
Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election
![Head shot of Andrew Feinberg](https://static.independent.co.uk/static-assets/support-us/andrew-feinberg.png)
Andrew Feinberg
White House Correspondent
Nearly five years after he held a reelection rally in El Paso, Texas, Donald Trump still owes the city more than $500,000 for police coverage, trash pickup and other municipal services — and local leaders have now slapped a six-figure late fee on the ex-president’s outstanding bill.
The City of El Paso sent an “updated invoice statement” to the Trump campaign that includes a one-time delinquency charge of $98,787.58, KTSM reported on Monday.
That adds a 21 percent premium to Trump’s original bill of $470,417.05, spread across six different city agencies. In all, El Paso authorities say the self-professed “law-and-order candidate” has stiffed them over $60,630.84 in Fire Department costs, $6,286.57 in Department of Aviation costs, $6,452 in Streets & Maintenance Department costs, $528 in Health Department costs, $15,577.52 in mass transit costs, and $380,942.12 in Police Department costs.
In all, Trump now owes El Paso $569,204.63, according to KTSM.
![Donald Trump, seen here speaking at his 2019 El Paso campaign rally, reportedly hasn’t paid the city back for its six-figure outlay during his visit.](https://static.independent.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2019/02/12/08/trump-AOC-green-new-deal.jpg)
Trump held the rally in question on February 11, 2019, at the El Paso County Coliseum, and was billed on March 27, 2019, with payment due April 26, 2019, the invoice shows. The city followed up with a letter on May 23, 2019, to the Trump campaign, which read, “We are contacting you regarding the past due invoice(s) listed above. We realize this may have been an oversight on your part; however, your account with the city of El Paso is extremely past due.”
The Trump campaign paid $5,000 in advance to the Coliseum, according to the CEO of the El Paso Sports Commission.
It is hardly Trump’s only unpaid bill, nor is it the longest-pending.
Trump still owes the City of Bozeman, Montana, where he held a rally last Friday, nearly $13,000 in fees he racked up in 2018, which includes $10,835.41 for police salaries, and owes the City of Bozeman some $45,000 for officer pay, according to NBC Montana. In 2019, an analysis by the Center for Public Integrity found at the time that Trump owed various municipalities “at least” $841,219 in for services provided.
![Trump, who claims to “love” law enforcement, has not reimbursed El Paso, Texas for the police protection it provided in 2019.](https://static.independent.co.uk/2021/07/14/20/newFile.jpg)
In 2016, before he was elected president, a USA Today investigation turned up hundreds of liens, judgments, and lawsuits filed by plumbers, painters, carpet installers, real estate brokers, waiters, bartenders, and others who accused Trump of stiffing them. Since then, he has been called out as a deadbeat by, among others, everyone from piano salesmen to electricians to veterans awaiting a promised $6 million donation to onetime Miami Vice star Don Johnson.
Many of Trump’s creditors have taken him to court over his past-due bills, and officials with the City of El Paso recently said they have consulted with attorneys about possible legal options. At the same time, an FEC spokesperson told NBC Montana that there is no formal mechanism in place to force the Trump campaign to settle its tab.
“While federal campaigns are permitted to use campaign funds to reimburse for these security costs,” FEC public affairs specialist Myles Martin said in an email, “Commission regulations do not specifically mandate that they do so.”
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.