Trump’s conversation with Obama draws speculation at Jimmy Carter’s funeral: Live updates
Incoming commander-in-chief lashes out at long-standing Democratic foe over natural disaster engulfing Hollywood as his expansionist ambitions met with mockery
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Donald Trump attended the funeral of former President Jimmy Carter on Thursday, sitting alongside other surviving commanders-in-chief. Much attention was devoted to whom he spoke and there was speculation over a moment where he and Barack Obama appeared to share a joke.
Earlier, the president-elect called on California Governor Gavin Newsom to resign over the wildfires currently rampaging through Los Angeles, which have already killed five people, destroyed more than 1,000 structures and forced 150,000 residents to evacuate.
The president-elect accused Newsom, city mayor Karen Bass, and Joe Biden of “gross incompetence” and declared the City of Angeles “a total wipeout” on his Truth Social platform.
“It’s ashes, and Gavin Newscum should resign. This is all his fault!!!”
Newsom, however, has hit back, angrily attacking Trump for attempting to “politize” the tragedy as his office accused the president-elect of engaging in “pure fiction” in his social media posts speculating on the environmental catastrophe.
Meanwhile, the incoming commander-in-chief’s dreams of using military force to annex Greenland and rename the Gulf of Mexico have been met with ridicule at home and abroad, with Denmark, France, Germany, and Britain declining to take him seriously.
New York's highest appeals court declines to block Trump's sentencing in hush money case
Biden still believes he could have beaten Trump and says successor ‘very complimentary’ in private
Trump rants about Biden’s offshore 625 million acre drilling ban, ‘That’s like the whole ocean!’ (It’s just 2 percent)
What does Donald Trump want with Greenland?
Google becomes latest tech company to fall in line by donating to Trump’s inauguration
The search giant is the latest company to donate $1m to the president-elect’s inaugural fund, following in the footsteps of other major corporations such as Amazon, Meta, Uber and OpenAI.
Ariana Baio has the story.
Google becomes the latest tech company to donate to Trump’s inauguration
Trump’s inaugural fund has received more than $170 million in donations
Volodymyr Zelensky urges Trump not to abandon Ukraine to Putin
Donald Trump must keep backing Ukraine with weapons and ammunition to ensure the country is not “erased off the map”, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has said during a final meeting of Kyiv’s allies before the president-elect returns to the White House.
Speaking at the 25th and final meeting of the Ukraine Contact Defence Group at the Ramstein air base in Germany, where more than 50 of Kyiv’s allies discussed how best to combat Vladimir Putin’s invasion, Zelensky said it would be “crazy” for Trump to alter the US’s support for his country.
“We’ve come such a long way that it would honestly be crazy to drop the ball now and not keep building on the defense coalitions we’ve created,” he said.
“No matter what’s going on in the world, everyone wants to feel sure that their country will not just be erased of the map.”
Tom Watling reports.
Zelensky urges Trump not to abandon Ukraine as US pledges $500m in military aid
‘We’ve come such a long way that it would honestly be crazy to drop the ball now,’ says Ukrainian leader
Trump’s Beverly Hills wildfire claim debunked
Speaking on Capitol Hill last night after meeting with congressional Republicans, the president-elect had this to say about the Los Angeles wildfires, adopting a noticeably more sympathetic tone than he has chosen on social media.
The only problem with that is that Beverly Hills is not actually on fire and is, instead, serving as a voluntary evacuation zone, with venues like the exclusive Beverly Hills Hotel throwing open their doors to local people temporarily displaced by the tragedy, as The Los Angeles Times has reported.
Emotional Newsom responds to Trump’s attacks over Los Angeles wildfires
Speaking to CNN’s Anderson Cooper, California Governor Gavin Newsom became visibly emotional when asked about the president-elect’s attempts to blame him for the unfolding environmental disaster.
“People are literally fleeing. People have lost their lives. Kids lost their schools, families completely torn asunder, churches burned down,” Newsom said, implying that Trump’s criticism was extremely ill-timed as well as unfair.
Railing at the Republican for attempting to politicize the disaster, he stopped himself short by saying: “I have a lot of thoughts and I know what I want to say... I won’t.”
By contrast, he praised Joe Biden by saying: “I stood next to a President of the United States of America today, and I was proud to be with Joe Biden.
“And he had the backs of every single person in this community.
“He didn’t play politics, didn’t try to divide any of us.”
Newsom’s press office has also rebuked Trump’s theorizing on social media about the fires, stating flatly: “There is no such document as the water restoration declaration – that is pure fiction.
“The governor is focused on protecting people, not playing politics, and making sure firefighters have all the resources they need.”
Bragg responds to Trump’s Supreme Court push with attack on presidential immunity argument
Meanwhile, back in the courts, the Manhattan prosecutor has filed his objections to the president-elect attempting to use the US Supreme Court to stop his hush money sentencing tomorrow, making similar arguments to the state appeals court we’ve just reported on.
In summary, Alvin Bragg says Trump’s claim “that any invocation of presidential immunity automatically entitles him to a stay pending appeal is incorrect.”
None of Trump’s claims “comes close to justifying a stay of the forthcoming sentencing,” he says.
The president-elect “makes the unprecedented claim that the temporary presidential immunity he will possess in the future fully immunizes him now, weeks before he even takes the oath of office, from all state-court criminal process,” Bragg writes, striking an incredulous tone.
“This extraordinary immunity claim is unsupported by any decision from any court. It is axiomatic that there is only one President at a time. Non-employees of the government do not exercise any official function that would be impaired by the conclusion of a criminal case against a private citizen for private conduct. And as this Court has repeatedly recognized, presidential immunity is strictly limited to the time of the President’s term in office.”
He adds that Trump’s claim that evidence used against him should have been shielded by immunity “does not support an interlocutory appeal or an automatic stay pending appeal because it is not an argument that defendant is immune from suit on the underlying criminal charges, which here are concededly based on defendant’s unofficial conduct having no connection to any presidential function”.
Bragg concludes: “There is a compelling public interest in proceeding to sentencing; the trial court has taken extraordinary steps to minimize any burdens on defendant, including by announcing his intent to sentence defendant to an unconditional discharge; and defendant has provided no record support for his claim that his duties as president-elect foreclose him from virtually attending a sentencing that will likely take no more than an hour.”
Watch: Trump shakes hands with Mike Pence at Carter’s funeral
Here’s a historic moment as the president-elect greets his old deputy in public for the first time since placing his life in mortal danger on January 6 2021.
In pictures: Trumps arrive at Washington National Cathedral for Jimmy Carter’s funeral
Donald and Melania Trump have arrived to their seats as they join other world leaders in paying their respects to the late former president, with the Trumps seating in front of Prince Edward, the Duke of Edinburgh, and the outgoing Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and next to a certain Barack Obama.
Federalist Society co-founder and ex-attorney general file Supreme Court brief backing Trump
Steve Calabresi and Edward Meese III have leapt to the president-elect’s defence and find themselves in direct opposition to the Manhattan prosecutor as they insist that “presidential immunity requires that the prosecution brought against him in New York County by District Attorney Alvin Bragg be dismissed and the jury verdict vacated.”
Meanwhile, the conservative think-tank the Heritage Foundation has put out a rather hysterical statement against Trump’s sentencing, warning that he is already engaged in official acts as president-elect and “besmirching his standing as he performs those duties would be noxious to the Constitution”.
It reads as follows:
“Even if the Constitution did not definitively require dismissal, prudence counsels it. While a state has a legitimate interests in each criminal prosecution to vindicate its sovereign right to define societal harms and pursue violators, the United States has a compelling public interest in the sitting president’s devoting his full attention to his duties, unburdened and undistracted by ongoing prosecutions.
“President Trump is already engaged in official duties as President-Elect and besmirching his standing as he performs those duties would be noxious to the Constitution. No President can be impaired in that fashion by a county prosecutor. Even if the charges were well-founded and the continued prosecution consistent with the Constitution, New York’s interests in any single criminal prosecution is dwarfed by the interests of the Nation as a whole.”
Breaking: New York Court of Appeals won’t block Trump’s Friday hush money sentencing
That leaves it up to the Supreme Court to rule on whether Judge Merchan’s proceedings go ahead.
Trump has now officially exhausted his options in New York to stop tomorrow’s sentencing.
Bragg’s response to his SCOTUS motion is due any minute now and sentencing is in less than 24 hours.
Here’s more.
New York's highest appeals court declines to block Trump's sentencing in hush money case
New York’s highest court has declined to block Donald Trump’s upcoming sentencing in his hush money case, leaving the U.S. Supreme Court as the president-elect’s likely last option to prevent the hearing from taking place Friday
Manhattan DA files opposition to Trump’s attempt to delay hush money sentencing with New York Court of Appeals
Alvin Bragg has raised his objection to the president-elect’s efforts to stop his sentencing by Judge Juan Merchan tomorrow and has until 10am ET to file a similar opposition with the US Supreme Court.
In summary, the Manhattan district attorney argues that Trump’s immunity claims don’t apply because none of the evidence he wants shielded from proceedings have anything to do with actions protected by the Supreme Court’s decision.
A federal court has already told him the actions at the center of the case aren’t protected because it involved a “purely a personal item of the president – a cover-up of an embarrassing event”, Bragg argues, and an entirely new claim that a president-elect should also be immune from any prosecution is “entirely baseless”.
The “least burdensome time” to sentence him is “now, before his inauguration, he says.
“Sentencing a sitting president during his term in office raises heightened and potentially insuperable obstacles” and Trump has “vociferously objected to being sentenced after the end of his forthcoming presidential term,” Bragg continues.
“By contrast, sentencing on January 10 raises none of these concerns: defendant has no viable claim of presidential immunity from ordinary criminal process; he is not yet engaged in any official presidential functions that would be disrupted by the sentencing; and given Supreme Court’s accommodations, including the offer for defendant to appear virtually rather than in person, sentencing could proceed in a manner that is minimally disruptive to defendant’s transitional activities.”
Moving ahead with tomorrow’s sentencing date “is also consistent with the defendant’s own litigation requests,” as it was Trump himself who asked that sentencing be adjourned until after the election, Bragg states.
The president-elect’s claim that he will be “seriously prejudiced by proceeding to sentencing on January 10” is also bogus because he has been allowed to “appear virtually, and in the people’s experience, it would be feasible to complete sentencing in less than an hour.”
His claim that sentencing is “somehow being ‘rushed’… is not supported by the record”.
“Defendant was convicted on May 3, 2024, and originally scheduled to be sentenced on July 11 2024,” Bragg concludes.
“Every adjournment of the sentencing date since then has been to accommodate the defendant’s requests for more time – including more time for post-trial briefing and more time to get past the date of the presidential election.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments