Peter Navarro tries and fails to rip up ‘Trump Lost’ sign in awkward press conference exchange
Navarro engages with woman holding up sign reading: ‘Trump lost (and you know it)’
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
Peter Navarro tried to unsuccessfully snatch an anti-Trump sign outside a courthouse on Wednesday following a US district judge’s order that he would not be able to use executive privilege as a shield to evade providing testimony and documents to the House Jan 6 Committee.
Mr Navarro, a former adviser to Donald Trump, attempted to snatch a “Trump lost” sign from a protester on the steps of the federal court house in Washington.
Mr Navarro was speaking to reporters outside the building and after taking questions he turned to engage with the woman who had been heckling him, holding a sign that read: “Trump lost (and you know it)”.
Mr Navarro exclaimed, “Who is this? Come on”, while unsuccessfully trying to snatch the sign from her grip.
The protester said, “Bro, you’re already facing charges”, when he tried to pull the sign from her.
Then he returned to the microphone to speak with reporters.
The woman added: “I’ve been here this whole time. Situational awareness.”
Mr Navarro will stand trial next month for allegedly wilfully defying a congressional subpoena after he claimed he was merely following an executive privilege claim from former president Trump.
Judge Amit P Mehta said Mr Navarro’s claim to have been instructed by Mr Trump to invoke executive privilege during a 20 February 2022 phone call was not accurate in a ruling delivered aloud from the bench and first reported by Politico.
“There was no formal invocation of executive privilege by [Trump] after personal consideration nor authorisation to Mr Navarro to invoke privilege on his behalf,” he said.
He said Mr Navarro had “not met his burden” to show that Mr Trump had ordered him to invoke executive privilege, which means Mr Navarro’s trial will start as scheduled.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments