Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Kamala Harris campaign paid Oprah Winfrey company far more than initially claimed – report

Television celebrity’s media company was initially said to have received $1m to cover costs of September campaign event

Shahana Yasmin
Monday 18 November 2024 08:32 GMT
Comments
Related: Kamala Harris tells Oprah Winfrey any intruder to her home is ‘getting shot’

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Kamala Harris campaign paid Oprah Winfrey’s company double the amount initially reported for a livetreamed event.

The Washington Examiner reported last week, citing Federal Election Commission filings, that the Harris campaign made a pair of $500,000 payments to Winfrey’s media company, Harpo Productions, on 15 October. Other media outlets, however, said that she was paid personally for her appearance.

In a statement, Harpo Productions confirmed that the Harris campaign paid for the cost of the town hall, without giving a figure. It maintained, however, that Winfrey received no payment for her appearance. “Oprah Winfrey was at no point during the campaign paid a personal fee, nor did she receive a fee from Harpo.”

Questioned by a TMZ reporter, Winfrey said she wasn’t paid for her endorsement. “Not true,” she said. “I was paid nothing, ever.”

Winfrey also posted a statement on her Instagram. “I was not paid a dime,” she wrote. “For the livestreaming event in September, my production company, Harpo, was asked to bring in set design, lights, cameras, crew, producers and every other item necessary (including the benches and the chairs we sat on) to put on a live production. I did not take any personal fee. However, the people who worked on that production needed to be paid. And were. End of story.”

Kamala Harris livestreamed the rally hosted by Oprah Winfrey on her campaign YouTube channel
Kamala Harris livestreamed the rally hosted by Oprah Winfrey on her campaign YouTube channel (AP)

Now The New York Times has detailed the spending on the town hall based on campaign finance reports and unnamed sources.

According to two people aware of the matter, the paper reported, “the $1m actually undercounts the full cost of the event which ran closer to $2.5m”.

The livestreamed event took place in Michigan on 19 September and was attended by a battery of celebrities like Meryl Streep, Bryan Cranston, Chris Rock, Ben Stiller, Jennifer Lopez, and Julia Roberts.

The event, hosted by Winfrey, got over 1.2 million views in under 12 hours.

Meryl Streep appears via weblink to question Kamala Harris ahead of the US presidential election
Meryl Streep appears via weblink to question Kamala Harris ahead of the US presidential election (AFP via Getty)

According to the Times, the outgoing vice president’s campaign spent $1.5 bn, or $100m per week, during her 15-week ultimately unsuccessful presidential run. Some of this money was spent on holding rallies in swing states with star performers like Lady Gaga in Philadelphia, Christina Aguilera in Nevada, Katy Perry in Pittsburgh, Jon Bon Jovi in Detroit, and James Taylor in North Carolina.

Though the celebrities were not paid for their performances, the support staff were, and the overall bill came to more than $10m.

Harris not only far outraised but also outspent her opponent Donald Trump, even though she had a much shorter campaign to run than the president-elect.

According to the Examiner, the Harris campaign spent more than $15m on production fees for events as well as more than $654m on advertising between 22 July and 5 November.

The Democrats have been embroiled in a blame game following Trump’s victory and questions over the Harris campaign’s use of campaign funds have continued to swirl.

“We spent money in stupid ways because we had a really bad strategy,” a former consultant to the DNC told Puck, citing money sent to fund Representative Colin Allred’s failed challenge against Texas Senator Ted Cruz, as well as money directed to help in Iowa, a historically Republican state.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in