Trump hush money sentencing delayed after Supreme Court gives ex-president substantial immunity: Live
Twice-impeached convicted felon and Republican presidential candidate handed huge win by conservative-majority bench
Support truly
independent journalism
Our mission is to deliver unbiased, fact-based reporting that holds power to account and exposes the truth.
Whether $5 or $50, every contribution counts.
Support us to deliver journalism without an agenda.
![Louise Thomas](https://static.independent.co.uk/static-assets/support-us/louise-thomas.png)
Louise Thomas
Editor
Manhattan prosecutors will not oppose Donald Trump’s request to delay his sentencing in his hush money trial after the Supreme Court ruled that the former president has “absolute” immunity from criminal prosecution for “official” acts as president.
In a letter to Justice Juan Merchan on Tuesday, prosecutors with the office of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg said Trump’s arguments are “without merit” but they do not oppose his request to push back the sentencing date as he files his legal arguments.
Joe Biden slammed the Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity from criminal prosecution during an address to the nation from the White House on Monday evening.
“For all practical purposes, today’s decision almost certainly means that there are virtually no limits on what a president can do,” the Democrat said.
“This is a fundamentally new principle. And it’s a dangerous precedent.”
The 6-3 majority decision was opposed by all three liberal justices on the bench, with Sonia Sotomayor warning in her dissent: “The president is now a king above the law.”
Biden is still struggling to calm Democrats following his disastrous debate performance last week. There are concerns with the party about his electability and impact on down-ticket candidates.
Full story: Supreme Court grants Trump immunity for ‘official’ acts in landmark ruling that will delay trial
Former presidents have some immunity from criminal prosecution for official actions, the Supreme Court ruled on Monday – extending the delay in the criminal case against Donald Trump on charges he plotted to overturn his 2020 presidential election loss, and all but ending prospects he could be tried before the November election.
In a 6-3 decision released on Monday, the court rejected Trump’s suggestion of total immunity but said some of the actions laid out in the federal election interference indictment related to his official acts and are protected.
Ariana Baio and Alex Woodward report:
![](https://static.independent.co.uk/2024/04/17/15/11283399.jpg?quality=75&width=1200&auto=webp)
SCOTUS grants Trump immunity for ‘official’ acts in ruling that will delay trial
Conservative majority of the court agreed the Constitution entitles the president to immunity for official acts
DNC: Only Biden stands between Trump and threats to our democracy
“Today’s ruling only underscores the stakes of this election – this is not just about partisan politics, this is about freedom. Here are the facts: on January 6, Donald Trump inspired a mob of violent insurrectionists, who attempted to overturn the results of a free and fair election. He has repeatedly put himself above our democracy, our constitution, and the American people. It’s hard to believe, but Trump has only become more unhinged in the years since he lost to Joe Biden, promising to be a dictator on ‘day one,’ suggesting the ‘termination’ of our Constitution to overturn valid election results, and warning of a ‘bloodbath’ if he loses again. The only thing standing between Donald Trump and his threats to our democracy is President Biden – and the American people will stand once again on the side of democracy this November.”
— Democratic National Committee chair Jaime Harrison
ACLU: Decision undermines ability to hold elected official accountable
“Our nation, including the District of Columbia, is governed by the rule of law, not kings,” said Monica Hopkins, executive director of the ACLU of the District of Columbia. “As we stated in our brief, there are few propositions more dangerous in a democracy than the notion that an elected head of state is above the law. Upholding the rule of law protects individual rights and prevents abuse of power by ensuring equal treatment and accountability. The Constitution does not give the President a special license to violate criminal law. Today’s ruling substantially undermines the ability to hold elected officials accountable and threatens longstanding principles undergirding our democracy.”
Read the Supreme Court’s ruling on Trump’s presidential immunity in full
The Supreme Court has ruled that Donald Trump, and any future president, has some immunity from criminal prosecution for official acts undertaken as president.
While the nation’s highest court rejected the former president’s suggestion of total immunity, in a 6-3 ruling the justices said that some actions – those deemed official acts – are protected.
Former presidents, however, have no immunity for unofficial acts – or conduct undertaken in private.
Here is the decision in full:
![](https://static.independent.co.uk/2024/06/18/19/SEI209305878.jpg?quality=75&width=1200&auto=webp)
Read the Supreme Court’s ruling on Trump’s presidential immunity in full
Former presidents have immunity from prosecution for official acts but not unofficial acts, the justices ruled
Barrett says organizing alternative slates of electors ‘private’ and not protected
In a footnote of her concurring opinion, Justice Amy Coney Barrett writes: “Sorting private from official conduct sometimes will be difficult—but not always. Take the President’s alleged attempt to organize alternative slates of electors. In my view, that conduct is private and therefore not entitled to protection.”
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments