Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Prosecutors knew Trump was hiding more documents thanks to Mar-a-Lago CCTV tapes

A less redacted version of the affidavit used to obtain a search warrant for Mr Trump’s property shows how prosecutors determined that he was likely hiding more classified documents

Andrew Feinberg
Thursday 06 July 2023 18:14 BST
Comments
Trump releases bizarre 'apocalyptic' presidential campaign video

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Federal investigators knew Donald Trump was most likely concealing classified documents among the myriad boxes of presidential records and other paraphernalia stored at his Mar-a-Lago estate, because of surveillance footage obtained by subpoena, according to a less redacted version of the affidavit used to secure a search warrant for his property last year.

The version of the affidavit was made public late Wednesday on the order of US Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart, who has been hearing arguments from a coalition of news organisations that have been seeking access to a fully unredacted version of the affidavit.

The newly public parts of the document provide more detail on what prosecutors knew and when they knew it in the weeks and months prior to their decision to ask for a warrant to search Mr Trump’s spaces at Mar-a-Lago, the 1920s-era mansion turned social club where he maintains his primary residence and post-presidential office.

Investigators used a subpoena to demand footage recorded by the club’s CCTV cameras in June 2022, not long after Mr Trump’s attorneys turned over a set of 38 documents with classification markings in response to a subpoena, along with a certification claiming that all such documents in the ex-president’s possession had been returned to the government.

The next month, they received a hard drive from the Trump Organization containing the CCTV output they’d subpoenaed, which included footage from motion-activated cameras in the area near the storage room where Mr Trump claimed to be keeping any and all White House records in his possession.

One camera, which bore the internal designation of “South Tunnel Liquor,” had in its field of view the gold-coloured door to the storage room and the tunnel which connected that area to the rest of the property.

According to the affidavit, a review of the footage from the period from before the purported search for documents by Mr Trump’s legal team showed that Mr Trump’s personal aide, Walt Nauta, had removed at least 60 of the boxes that had been stored there prior to the search, while only returning between 25 and 30 boxes to that location.

The FBI agent who drafted the affidavit wrote that “the current location of the boxes removed from the storage room but not returned to it” was “unknown” at the time.

The missing boxes led prosecutors to suspect that Mr Trump was concealing yet more classified documents, considering that his attorneys only turned over 38 such papers, while a tranche of 15 boxes retrieved from the property by the National Archives and Records Administration in early 2022 yielded roughly 200 separate documents with classification markings.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in