Republican congressman Devin Nunes loses legal fight with Twitter over imaginary cow
Californian representative losses against cow who called him ‘udderly worthless’
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Republican congressman Devin Nunes cannot sue Twitter over accounts alleged to have mocked the politician with parody personas representing a cow and the politician's mother.
A Virginia judge dismissed Mr Nunes's defamation lawsuit on Wednesday because social media companies are not liable for statements made on their platforms.
The Trump loyalist submitted the lawsuit against Twitter in 2019 over two accounts and another user who posted satirical content, which he claimed cost him votes – despite him being re-elected – and defamed him.
The Republican also demanded that Twitter unmask the anonymous accounts, named @DevinNunesMom and @DevinCow, and pay $250m (£167m) in damages.
Twitter said it would not reveal who managed Devin Nunes’ Mom and Devin Nunes’ Cow, who once wrote that “Devin’s boots are full of manure. He’s udderly worthless and it’s pasture time to mooove him to prison.”
Judge John Marshall wrote last week that Mr Nunes “seeks to have the court treat Twitter as the publisher or speaker of the content provided by others based on its allowing or not allowing certain content to be on its Internet platform. The court refuses to do so.”
The Virginia Circuit Court, which cited Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, added that Mr Nunes’s lawsuit was “substantially similar” to previous cases on social media content.
Twitter welcomed the court’s decision in a statement, saying: “Twitter enforces the Twitter Rules impartially for everyone who uses our service around the world, regardless of their background or political affiliation.
“We are constantly improving our efforts to serve the public conversation and will continue to be transparent with the public.”
Mr Nunes suggested on Twitter on Wednesday that he would use an alternative social media platform, and wrote: “Parler is open for business!”
Devin Nunes’ Cow wrote: “I have some good moooos for you. Oh, wait, it’s good for me and not for you.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments