Betting on the election will soon be legal in US after massive court ruling
Betters have already poured hundreds of millions of dollars into the political prediction market
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Betting on the outcome of US congressional elections may now be legal thanks to a Wednesday federal appeals court ruling.
The Commodities Futures Trading Commission asked the appeals court to block Kalshi — a financial exchange startup — from offering “Congressional Control Contracts.” The contracts allow buyers to bet on which political parties will win the House and Senate following the 2024 election.
On Wednesday, the appeals court declined to block a lower court’s decision that allowed betting on the outcomes, opposing the CFTC’s argument that the betting could “potentially be used in ways that would have an adverse effect on the integrity of elections, or the perception of integrity of elections.”
Last month the US District Court for the District of Columbia sided with Kalshi, which argued that the CFTC had overreached by trying to block its betting market, The Hill reports.
“In short, the concerns voiced by the Commission are understandable given the uncertain effects that Congressional Control Contracts will have on our elections, which are the very linchpin of our democracy,” Judge Patricia Millett wrote in the opinion of the original ruling. “But whether the statutory text allows the Commission to bar such event contracts is debatable, and the Commission has not substantiated that risks to election integrity are likely to materialize if Kalshi is allowed to operate its exchange during the pendency of this appeal.”
Luana Lopes Lara, the founder of Kalshi, wrote in a post on X that she was “so grateful” for the ruling.
The company’s CEO, Tarek Mansour, also issued a statement celebrating the ruling.
“We are incredibly honored to bring safe, regulated, and trusted election markets to the US,” Mansour said. “This week is the dawn of a new era for financial markets.”
The Independent has requested comment for the CFTC.
Despite the legal questions surrounding the contracts, betters have already tossed hundreds of millions into the market predicting the outcome of the upcoming election. The markets were temporarily frozen while the appeals court made its decision.
This may just be the start of political betting on Kalshi’s platform; the company has reportedly said it hopes to expand its markets to include other political showdowns, including the US presidential election, according to Politico.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments