Sarah Palin: Attorneys question New York Times writer as defamation trial closes first day
Ex-governor wants ‘justice’ four years after suing newspaper over 2017 editorial
Your support helps us to tell the story
My recent work focusing on Latino voters in Arizona has shown me how crucial independent journalism is in giving voice to underrepresented communities.
Your support is what allows us to tell these stories, bringing attention to the issues that are often overlooked. Without your contributions, these voices might not be heard.
Every dollar you give helps us continue to shine a light on these critical issues in the run up to the election and beyond
Eric Garcia
Washington Bureau Chief
Former Alaska governor and one-time Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin returned to federal court on 3 February after testing positive for Covid-19 last month, delaying the start of a trial stemming from her defamation suit against The New York Times.
Ms Palin, who is not vaccinated, was spotted dining at several Manhattan restaurants after her positive results last week, against the city’s public health guidance for infected people to remain isolated.
Jury selection and opening arguments began on Thursday, nearly four years after Ms Palin filed a libel lawsuit against the newspaper over an editorial incorrectly linking a 2011 shooting of congresswoman Gabby Giffords to a map circulated by Ms Palin’s political action committee that circled Democratic districts with crosshairs.
The newspaper quickly corrected the error and apologised to Ms Palin, who has accused the newspaper and then-editorial board editor James Bennet of knowingly publishing false information.
The question central to the jury’s decision is whether they believe the newspaper knowingly published a defamatory statement, “meaning the statement tended to expose the plaintiff to public hatred, contempt, ridicule or disgrace,” according to jury instructions.
David Axelrod, delivering opening remarks on behalf of The New York Times, stressed that the newspaper corrected the error at issue and apologized. The disputed words in the editorial were on the newspaper’s website for 12 hours.
“This wasn’t a political hit job,” he said.
Ms Palin’s attorney Shane Vogt claimed that the newspaper “has a policy against apologizing because they think they can do whatever they want. They are The New York Times.”
He also questioned the trial’s first witness – New York Times feature writer Elizabeth Williamson, who was an editorial board staffer when she wrote a first draft of the editorial, before Mr Bennet added sentences that forced the newspaper to issue a correction.
Outside the courtroom, the ex-governor bumped into Michael Avenatti – who is accused of defrauding Stormy Daniels, who he represented in her legal battle with Donald Trump – during lunch recess. They wished each other good luck, MrAvenatti said he didn’t mean “good luck” in MsPalin’s case specifically but as a general statement.
Before she entered US District Court on Thursday morning, she told reporters that she wants “justice, for people who expect the truth in the media.”
The trial is expected to last a week, and Ms Palin will testify.
Follow live updates
Trial begins over ex-governor’s libel claim
Experts believe the future of the First Amendment could be at stake in Sarah Palin’s libel suit against The New York Times, with the case expected to test the legal definition of political free speech in the United States.
Jury selection began today after she tested positive for Covid-19, delaying the start of the trial.
Learn more about the case and what’s at stake:
Sarah Palin’s New York Times lawsuit: Trial begins over ex-governor’s libel claim
Experts believe Ms Palin faces an “enormously steep uphill battle” to win her libel lawsuit, which was delayed after the former Alaska governor tested positive to Covid
NYC mayor’s office says anyone in contact with Sarah Palin should be tested for Covid
City Hall says anyone who came in contact with Sarah Palin should be tested for Covid-19 after she was spotted at two New York City restaurants following her positive diagnosis on 24 January.
She also dined indoors at an Upper East Side Italian restaurant two days earlier, despite the city’s requirements that customers show proof of vaccination to eat indoors.
She is not vaccinated.
Anyone in contact with Sarah Palin should be tested for Covid, NYC mayor office says
Unvaccinated former Republican vice presidential candidate flouts public health guidance after positive tests
Sarah Palin arrives at federal court as jury selection is underway
Sarah Palin told reporters outside US District Court in Manhattan on Thursday that she wants “justice, for people who expect the truth in the media.”
Judge Jed Rakoff told prospective jurors that “some of you undoubtedly will have heard of one side or the other or both and will have, perhaps, views.”
“That’s an irrelevance. What is central to every jury is the American sense of fair play,” he said, according to Reuters.
The trial is expected to last five days, and Ms Palin will testify.
Palin says dining outdoors ‘wasn’t improper nor was it illegal'
After testing positive for Covid-19 and refusing to isolate, against urgent public health guidance, Sarah Palin dined outdoors at two Manhattan restaurants
“Outdoor dining wasn’t improper nor was it illegal,” she told Law 360 as she entered an elevator in US District Court on Thursday.
She told reporters this morning that she tested negative on Wednesday and did not have symptoms after testing positive.
“All cleared to go never had any kind of symptoms and feel great,” she said.
NYT: ‘This wasn’t a political hit job'
David Axelrod, delivering opening remarks on behalf of The New York Times, stressed that the newspaper corrected the error at issue and apologized. The disputed words in the editorial were on the newspaper’s website for 12 hours.
Palin’s attorney Shane Vogt claimed that the newspaper “has a policy against apologizing because they think they can do whatever they want. They are The New York Times.”
The 2017 editorial – “America’s Lethal Politics” – sought to contextualize then-recent political violence by pointing to the circumstances motivating Jared Loughner to kill six people at an event with Democratic US Rep Gabrielle Giffords in Arizona in 2011.
The editorial incorrectly linked the shooting to a map from Palin’s PAC showing crosshairs over Democratic districts, and edits from editorial page editor James Bennet appeared to suggest a link between “incitement” to violence and the map – a word central to Palin’s lawsuit.
The corrected editorial includes a lengthy correction:
“An editorial on Thursday about the shooting of Representative Steve Scalise incorrectly stated that a link existed between political rhetoric and the 2011 shooting of Representative Gabby Giffords. In fact, no such link was established. The editorial also incorrectly described a map distributed by a political action committee before that shooting. It depicted electoral districts, not individual Democratic lawmakers, beneath stylized cross hairs.
Two weeks later, Palin sued.
Avenatti and Palin wish each other good luck
New York, testing its purported status as the center of the universe, currently is hosting a trial for Sarah Palin against the newspaper of the record in a courthouse where Michael Avenatti is also on trial. President Joe Biden is also on his way to visit Mayor Eric Adams and Governor Kathy Hochul.
The ex-governor and Avenatti – who is accused of defrauding Stormy Daniels, who he represented in her legal battle with Donald Trump – also bumped into each other at US District Court during lunch recess and wished each other good luck. (Avenatti said he didn’t mean “good luck” in Palin’s case specifically but as a general statement.)
Pailin also falsely claimed to a reporter that she does not need to be vaccinated against Covid-19 because she has “natural immunity.”
First trial witness is former NYT editorial board staffer
Elizabeth Williamson, a former editorial writer and now a features writer for the newspaper, is the first witness.
She wrote a first draft of the editorial at the centre of Palin’s suit before then-editor James Bennett added sentences that forced the newspaper to issue a correction.
Attorney for Palin helped win Gawker-killing verdict
The attorney who delivered opening remarks for Sarah Palin in her lawsuit against The New York Times also helped win a $140m jury verdict against Gawker on behalf of Hulk Hogan.
The outcome of that trial, with Hogan receiving financial support from Peter Thiel, forced the publication into bankruptcy before closing down. The website relaunched in 2021.
Attorney Shane Vogt said on Thursday that “we come to this case with our eyes wide open” and faces an “uphill battle” to prove Palin’s case, which was initially dismissed by the same judge presiding over the trial.
“We are not here to win your votes for [Ms Palin] ... or her policies,” he told jurors. “We are going to focus on what the defendants did and said.”
Judge dismisses jury for the day as Palin attorney questions NYT writer about emails over editorial
Elizabeth Williamson, a former editorial writer and now a features writer for the newspaper, who wrote a first draft of the editorial in question, was the first witness to testify.
Following a series of questions from Palin’s attorney about editorial board functions and emails about the editorial, Judge Rakoff dismissed the jury for the day.
They will reconvene at 9.30am EST on Friday.
Palin’s attorney questions NYT writer over editorial process
Testimony from Elizabeth Williamson, who wrote a first draft of the editorial before James Bennet’s errors prompted corrections from the newspaper, will continue tomorrow.
Reporting in 2020 from the Columbia Journalism Review detailed how editorial staff drafted and then worked to correct the editorial – including texts from Bennet to Williamson, in which he said apologised to her and said he “moved too fast” when he made his edits.
Palin’s attorneys brought up the fact that editorial staffers were sharing a 2011 column from Frank Rich about the shooting, though he worded his column to avoid pinning the blame on Palin or anyone, adding that “we have no idea nor does it matter”.
Williamson will be back on the witness stand tomorrow. Palin’s attorneys said they have another hour of questioning.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments