Proud Boys trial : Police testify to ‘dire’ scene on Jan 6 as far-right group faces sedition charges
Five members of nationalist gang Proud Boys charged with seditious conspiracy for roles in January 6 attack
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A second day of a trial for five members of far-right nationalist group the Proud Boys continued on Friday with testimony from a US Capitol Police officer and video and radio transmission audio evidence detailing the mob’s movements on 6 January, 2021, including one defendant using a stolen riot shield to bust out a window of the US Capitol.
Jurors will return to the court on 17 January for the trial involving former Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio and members Ethan Nordean, Joe Biggs, Dominic Pezzola and Zachary Rehl, who are charged with seditious conspiracy for their alleged roles in the riots. If convicted, they face up to 20 years in prison.
Federal prosecutors will try to convince a jury that the defendants conspired to forcefully oppose the lawful transfer of presidential power when a joint session of Congress convened to certify the results of the 2020 presidential election.
In opening arguments, federal prosecutors said that the five men “took aim at the heart of democracy” by conspiring to storm the Capitol.
Mic issues, Rudy Giuliani’s hair dye and blaming Trump: How opening day of the Proud Boys trial went down- ‘Burn that city to ash’: Why five Proud Boys are on trial two years after January 6
Enrique Tarrio’s attorney blames Trump for ‘unleashing the mob’ on January 6 at Proud Boys sedition trial
Proud Boys rallied to ‘take the f****** Capitol’ before Trump’s January 6 speech, prosecutors say
Jurors hear recording of Tarrio discussing plans to ‘storm the Capitol'
Prosecutors played audio of now-former Proud Boys chair Enrique Tarrio saying “I didn’t hear this until now. You want to storm the Capitol.”
“In some situations in life you have to guess if people mean what they say,” Assistant US Attorney Jason McCullough said. “At other times, people do exactly what they say they’re going to do. In this trial, you won’t have to guess.”
‘Let’s f****** do it’: Proud Boys rallied to ‘take the f****** Capitol’ before Trump started rally speech
Jurors were shown video of defendant Ethan Nordean taken at 11.41am on 6 January, 2021, according to prosecutors.
Someone can be heard saying “Ethan, let’s f****** do it”. Moments later, at 11.47am, he tells the crowd “take the f****** Capitol”.
Donald Trump began his speech to a rally crowd at 11.57am.
Proud Boys rallied to ‘take the f****** Capitol’ before Trump’s January 6 speech, prosecutors say
Members of the far-right nationalist gang the Proud Boys rallied a crowd to “take the f****** Capitol” as a joint session of Congress convened to certify the results of the 2020 presidential election on 6 January, 2021.
In opening arguments in a trial for five members of the group charged with seditious conspiracy for their actions leading up to and during the attack, federal prosecutors showed video taken roughly 20 minutes before then-President Donald Trump addressed his supporters at a nearby rally.
Assistant US Attorney Jason McCullough said the group did not intend to listen to the president’s speech; they had always planned to lead a crowd to the Capitol to forcibly stop the transfer of presidential power.
“They hoped the ‘normies’ – that is, the civilians – would burn the city to ash,” he told jurors on 12 January.
Our breaking report from today’s opening arguments:
Proud Boys rallied to ‘take the f****** Capitol’ before Trump’s speech, trial hears
Five members of the far-right group face charges of seditious conspiracy
Judge Kelly denies defense attorneys’ request for a mistrial after prosecutors close opening arguments
Judge Timothy Kelly has denied a request from defense attorneys to declare a mistrial after federal prosecutors closed their opening arguments shortly before 1pm on Thursday.
Zachary Rehl’s attorney Carmen Hernandez claimed that the Justice Depamrtment’s opening statement was “misleading and inflammatory” and presented evidence out of context.
“I don’t think the government did anything to warrant a mistrial, so its denied,” Judge Kelly said.
About that ‘burn the city to ash’ comment
Federal prosecutors have argued that rioters who were not connected with the group served as “tools” for the Proud Boys and their alleged plot, which would not have succeeded without “weaponizing the crowd,” prosecutors wrote in court filings.
In a message on Telegram the day of the attack, one group leader wrote “I want to see thousands of normies burn that city to ash today.”
‘Burn that city to ash’: Why five Proud Boys are on trial two years after January 6
Members of the far-right gang, including its former leader, face up to 20 years in prison if convicted of seditious conspiracy for their roles in the Capitol attack, Alex Woodward reports
Defense attorneys prepare to make opening arguments as court returns from lunch break
Defense attorneys for the five Proud Boys members on trial for seditious conspiracy are preparing their opening arguments. Judge Timothy Kelly has returned to the courtroom and the trial will resume shortly.
The men on trial include former chair Enrique Tarrio as well as Ethan Nordean, Joe Biggs, Dominic Pezzola and Zachary Rehl.
Defense for Proud Boys Ethan Nordean begins opening statement calling January 6 a ‘disgrace’ and ‘embarrassment’
Nick Smith opened his defense argument for his client Ethan Nordean by calling the events of Janaury 6 “a disgrace”.
“An embarrassment to the country, a historic embarrassment,” he said. “It was a crass spectacle in front of the world.”
Mr Smith said jurors “will not hear from a single defendant in this trial they are proud, today, of [the riot].”
“Like thousands of other protesters that day, you’ll see Ethan Nordean walked into the building, broke nothing, had no weapons, accosted no member of office,” he added.
Nordean’s attorney claims government evidence does not support conspiracy charge
Attorney Nick Smith said jurors will not see any evidence from federal prosecutors that supports a charge of conspiracy, alleging the prosecution’s evidence is selective and misleading.
The defense so far mirrors other high-profile January 6 cases involving serious charges of conspiracy or other felonies, which have largely relied on arguing that what defendants did was wrong but did not rise to the level of a serious crime, and that the “plot” behind it was nothing more than rhetoric.
Defense argues Capitol riot and other ‘complex phenomena’ must have a ‘cause bigger than effect'
Nick Smith continues his opening statement, arguing that “complex phenomena” like the Capitol riot “or a revolution” must “have a cause that’s as big as the effect,” building an argument that the events of January 6 weren’t any one person’s fault but the collective energy swept up defendants into the chaos.
“When it comes to complex phenomena like this – we assume like a riot or a revolution – must have a cause that’s as big as the effect,” he said. “We also know from our experience that’s true, in chaotic situations that happen in the moment can have tremendously large effects.”
He argued that the government’s case rests on a logical fallacy: “We hear a rooster crow and then the sun rises. We may think that the rooster’s crowing may have some influence on the sun rising. We know it doesn’t work this way.”
Defense attorney says government witnesses will corroborate claim that there was no plan on January 6
Nick Smith, the attorney for defendant Ethan Nordean, claims that testimony from three government witnesses – all convicted Proud Boys who pleaded guilty to seditious conspiracy last year – will corroborate claims that the five men on trial did not have a plan on 6 January, 2021.
Jeremy Bertino, who pleaded guilty to seditious conspiracy in October, said that “everything that was supposed to happen that day was a peaceful protest,” according to Mr Smith.
Witness Charles Donohoe also said that the “conspiracy stuff isn’t true,” Mr Smith said. A third witness, John Stewart, also told the government that “it was just a protest, that’s what it was supposed to be, just a protest” and was not a preplanned event, according to Mr Smith.
“The plan was to discuss the plan in person on the ground in DC, not before,” Mr Donohoe reportedly testified.
Mr Smith said that evidence will show that “not a single text or Telegram is about storming the Capitol, jumping barricades … plotting any crime, or using force.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments