Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

As it happenedended

UK politics news: Government 'did not want to know' about evidence of Russian interference in Brexit vote as long-awaited report released

Follow all the latest updates

Jon Sharman,Adam Forrest,Peter Stubley
Tuesday 21 July 2020 21:07 BST
Comments
UK Government ‘did not seek’ to look into possible Russian political interference

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) has judged it “credible” that Russia tried to interfere in the Scottish independence referendum as part of an effort to influence political life in the UK.

MPs setting out the Russia report have told Boris Johnson to order an assessment of “potential” Russian meddling in the Brexit referendum. The government “did not want to know” if there been interference in the 2016 vote – and had “actively avoided looking for evidence”, they said.

However the government quickly rejected the call for further enquiries, with foreign secretary Dominic Raab describing a retrospective investigation as “unnecessary”.

"I have been on the receiving end of certain practices in the Home Office, which quite frankly speak to some of the points which came out of the review," says Priti Patel, without explaining further.

Is it a reference to complaints about her "bullying" of staff?

Peter Stubley21 July 2020 14:14

Priti Patel claimed that her ambition is for "a fair, humane, compassionate and outward-looking Home Office that represents people from every corner of our diverse society".

The Home Secretary told MPs: "A series of reconciliation events to rebuild the relationship between the Home Office and those who were affected will now take place. This is an essential step to enable people whose lives were shattered because of Windrush to directly articulate the impact this scandal has had on their lives. We must learn from the past.

"Mandatory training is being introduced for new and existing members of the Home Office staff to ensure everyone working across the department understands and appreciates the history of migration and race across the country."

She added: "There are simply not enough individuals from black, Asian or minority ethnic staff working at the top in senior roles and there are far too many times where I am the only non-white face in the room.

"Action must happen now. So right now, I am introducing more diverse shortlists for senior jobs, specialist mentoring and sponsorship programmes to help develop a wider pool of talent and drive cultural change."

Peter Stubley21 July 2020 14:15

Sturgeon open to IndyRef interference probe

Scotland's First Minister said she has "no objection" to an inquiry being launched into Russian interference in the Scottish independence referendum.

Speaking at the Scottish Government's coronavirus briefing on Tuesday, hours after a heavily redacted report by Westminster's Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) was published, Nicola Sturgeon said governments should not be "complacent" about the possibility of interference in democratic processes.

The UK Government response to such warnings could be viewed as "negligence", she said.

She said: "If there's to be an inquiry into that - and I would have no objections, to the contrary - it is for the UK Government to do."

Peter Stubley21 July 2020 14:19

PM rejects calls for crackdown on 'Londongrad'

Boris Johnson has rejected a second key strand of the Russia report, its call for a crackdown to stop London being a “laundromat” for illicit Russian cash.

The UK already has “some of the strongest controls in the world”, the prime minister’s spokesman insisted.

Peter Stubley21 July 2020 14:29

Six things we learned from Russia report

The long-awaited official report on Russia’s activities in the UK has concluded that Downing Street “took its eye off the ball” and failed to respond to a range of threats from Moscow.

So what are the very biggest takeaways from the 50-page dossier?

Peter Stubley21 July 2020 14:38
Peter Stubley21 July 2020 14:45

PM insists Brexit vote was 'fair'

Boris Johnson is "absolutely" confident the 2016 European Union referendum result was fair, the Prime Minister's official spokesman said.

"We have seen no evidence of successful interference in the EU referendum," the spokesman said, as he confirmed the Government would not order an investigation of Russian activities around the vote.

"Our intelligence and security agencies produce regular assessments of the threat posed by hostile state activities, including any potential interference in past or current UK democratic processes."

Peter Stubley21 July 2020 14:46

PM's care home claim dismissed by CMO

Professor Chris Whitty has suggested care homes are not to blame for the severe problems they faced with coronavirus in an apparent swipe at Boris Johnson remarks on the issue.

Appearing at the Health and Social Care Committee, the chief medical officer for England said that major risks in social care settings were not considered early on in the pandemic, including staff working in multiple residences and those not paid sick leave. 

Peter Stubley21 July 2020 14:59

Lower pay rise for long-serving teachers 'unfair', say unions

Education unions have warned that more experienced teachers may not stay in the profession following the Government's announcement of lower pay rises for long-serving staff.

One head teachers' union leader described it as a "kick in the teeth" for many teachers and he warned that many schools may struggle to pay the salary increases to staff without funding due to tight budgets.

The comments came after the Government revealed that the 3.1 per cent pay rise for teachers will consist of a 5.5 per cent rise to the starting salary for the profession, while more experienced teachers will see a 2.75 per cent rise.

Dr Mary Bousted, joint general secretary of the National Education Union (NEU), said: "The prospect of salaries tapering off as they progress through the profession means that progress made in recruiting teachers will not be sustained in retaining them.

"More experienced teachers and leaders must see their immense hard work and efforts rewarded fairly, and this pay award does not do that."

Geoff Barton, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, said: "First, we do not think it is fair or reasonable that the pay award is much lower for experienced teachers and leaders after years of pay austerity which has seen the real value of salaries deteriorate.

"This won't help to keep long-serving teachers in the profession and feels like a kick in the teeth."

Peter Stubley21 July 2020 15:14

Attorney General: 'No regrets' over Cummings lockdown trip tweet

Suella Braverman has again denied her tweet in support of Dominic Cummings' trip to Durham during lockdown amounted to political interference in due process.

Speaking at her first appearance before the Justice Committee, she said: "I don't think there is any question I offered a legal opinion. I treat the independence - operationally and in other ways - of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) extremely seriously.

"There's no question of my having interfered with or influenced any decision made by the CPS or the police on that matter."

She added: "I don't regret tweeting in the way that I did."

The tweet in question was made by the attorney general on 23 May: "Protecting one's family is what any good parent does. The 10DowningStreet statement clarifies the situation and it is wholly inappropriate to politicise it."

Peter Stubley21 July 2020 15:27

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in