James Cleverly denies claims he called Stockton North a s***hole
Stockton North MP Alex Cunningham demanded apology in the Commons from home secretary
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Home secretary James Cleverly has denied claims that he called a Labour MPās north east constituency a ās***holeā.
Alex Cunningham, MP for Stockton North, alleged the comment was made by the Tory cabinet minister during PMQs on Wednesday.
Speaking in the Commons later, the Labour MP called out the home secretary and demanded an apology.
But Mr Cleverlyās spokesman said: āHe did not say that, and would not. Heās disappointed people would accuse him of doing so.ā
The alleged incident comes days after Mr Cleverly refused to deny that he called Rishi Sunakās Rwanda deportation policy ābats***ā.
Mr Sunakās new home secretary said he ādid not rememberā using the expletiveā to describe the Tory governmentās flagship āstop the boatsā policy.
The s***hole comment is said to have taken place after the prime minister was challenged by Mr Cunningham on the level of child poverty in his constituency in northeast England.
There is no doubt that these comments shame the home secretary, this rotten government, and the Tory party
Making a point of order in the Commons later in the day, Mr Cunningham said: āBefore the prime minister answered, the home secretary chose to add in his pennyworth. Yes, I have contacted his office advising him I planned to name him, but sadly he has chosen not to be in the chamber.ā
āHe was seen and heard to say: āBecause itās a s***holeā. I know he is denying being the culprit, but the audio is clear and has been checked, and checked, and checked again,ā claimed the Labour MP.
He added: āThere is no doubt that these comments shame the home secretary, this rotten government, and the Tory party. He is clearly unfit for his high office.ā
The Independent understands Mr Cleverly is not going to complain about Mr Cunninghamās allegation.
Mr Cunningham also asked the Commons authorities how he could secure an apology from the home secretary for āhis appalling insult and foul languageā about his seat.
Deputy Speaker Dame Eleanor Laing said it was her understanding that Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle ādidnāt hear any remark of the kind from the chair at the time when the honourable gentleman was asking his questionā.
She said: āI understand that the alleged words were not actually used, though I appreciate what [Mr Cunningham] says.
āBut I think we all know that itās very difficult in the noisy atmosphere of prime ministerās questions to discern exactly what someone says. So I can make no judgement here from the chair as to what was or wasnāt said.ā
Dame Eleanor said she understood Mr Cunninghamās concern, and added: āI would remind all honourable members of the need for good temper and moderation in the language they use in this chamber.ā
Speaking at PMQs, Mr Cunningham had asked: āWhy are 34 per cent of children in my constituency living in poverty?ā
Responding at the despatch box, Mr Sunak said: āItās this government that has ensured that across our country 1.7 million fewer people are living in ā¦ poverty as a result of the actions of this government.ā
Mr Cunningham could then be heard calling out āitās not trueā to the prime minister. Mr Sunak went on: āYes that is true. Not only that, hundreds of thousands fewer children are living in poverty, and income inequality is at a lower level than we inherited from the party opposite.ā
āBut we donāt want any child to grow up in poverty, and the best way to make sure that happens is to ensure they do not grow up in a workless household. And that is why the right strategy is to ensure that we provide as many children with the opportunity to grow up with parents in work.ā
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments