Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Howard refuses Silcott appeal request

Terry Kirby
Friday 21 January 1994 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

(First Edition)

AN APPLICATION by Winston Silcott - who was cleared of the murder of PC Keith Blakelock - for his conviction for a 1984 killing to be referred to the Court of Appeal has been rejected by Michael Howard, the Home Secretary, writes Terry Kirby. The decision, announced yesterday, comes 18 months after the submission from Silcott's lawyers to the Home Office.

In 1991, Silcott's conviction for the murder of PC Blakelock during the Broadwater Farm riots in north London in 1985 was quashed by the Court of Appeal after doubts were cast on the reliability of his alleged confession. At the time of the riots, Silcott was on remand for the murder of Anthony Smith, a boxer whom he stabbed at a party in 1984. He was convicted before the Blakelock trial. According to Silcott's lawyers, the new dossier in the Smith case included a statement from a witness which, along with other evidence, showed that Silcott had acted in reasonable self-defence.

A Home Office spokesman said that Mr Howard had taken those matters into account. In a statement from Swaleside prison, Kent, Silcott said yesterday: 'I cannot say I am surprised given the present Home Secretary and the climate in the criminal justice system. Whatever matters we put forward would have been rejected.'

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in