HS2 news - live: Sunak insists he’s committed to levelling up as rail backlash grows
Rishi Sunak says his government is committed to ‘spreading opportunity around the country, not just in the North but in the Midlands, in all other regions of our fantastic country’
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Rishi Sunak has insisted he is committed to levelling up despite again failing to confirm that the northern leg of HS2 rail project will go ahead.
The prime minister refused to comment on what he described as “speculation” about part of the line being axed.The Independent first revealed two weeks ago that Mr Sunak was considering scrapping plans for the high-speed rail network between Birmingham and Manchester over concerns about its spiralling cost.
Speaking today on a visit to a community centre in Hertfordshire, the PM said: “What I would say is we’re absolutely committed to levelling up and spreading opportunity around the country, not just in the North but in the Midlands, in all other regions of our fantastic country.”
Earlier, Labour’s Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham warned that ditching the northern phase of HS2 would be a disaster of “epic proportions” for the region.
An announcement is expected before the Tory Party conference in Manchester next weekend and The Independent understands the northern phase of HS2 could be delayed by up to seven years as part of a bid to scrap the project in the long-term.
Rail experts say downscaling HS2 would be ‘commercial and operational mess’
Downscaling HS2 would create “a commercial and operational mess”, industry experts have warned.
William Barter, a railway consultant whose recent clients include the Department for Transport, told the PA news agency this would result in “80 per cent of the costs and 20 per cent of the benefits”, while rail engineer and writer Gareth Dennis claimed it would be a “stupid decision”.
Under existing plans, HS2 trains will run on high-speed lines between London and Manchester, as well as running on existing lines to destinations such as Glasgow, Liverpool and North Wales.
Full report:
Rail experts say downscaling HS2 would be ‘commercial and operational mess’
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and Chancellor Jeremy Hunt are reported to be meeting to discuss the future of the project in the coming days.
Khan: HS2 could be ‘shuttle service’ between west London and Birmingham
Sadiq Khan has said he is “astonished” that HS2 could become a “shuttle service” between Birmingham and west London.
“I’m astonished and alarmed and it’s worth reminding people what this will mean. This will mean that in future journeys from Birmingham, to the centre of London on High Speed 2 will take longer than it currently takes,” the Labour mayor of London told the Press Association.
“I’m astonished that the government’s allowed costs to escalate the way they have. They’ve been in power since 2010, but I’m also astonished they are seriously considering having a High Speed 2 line that is a shuttle service between Birmingham Curzon Street and Old Oak Common, which is six miles to the west of central London.”
He added: “Also in Euston – they have destroyed businesses, they’ve demolished homes. They’ve let down a community. Euston is a cluster of Life Sciences, of tech, of education, of a culture and they will miss out on this investment as will communities north of Birmingham and Manchester.”
Passenger numbers have bounced back since Covid, says rail industry body
Rail passengers are returning despite the changes brought about by Covid, according to the Railway Industry Association.
Simon Calder reports: The body – which represents companies that stand to benefit from the construction of HS2 – says passenger numbers were 17 per cent down on pre-pandemic numbers in the last three months of 2022, but in spring and summer this year the figures are just 4 per cent down.
Darren Caplan, chief executive of the Railway Industry Association, said: “One of the reasons cited by critical politicians for scrapping HS2 Phase 2 is that passenger numbers are significantly down and people will not travel by train in future.
“This is plain wrong, and all of us associated with the railway industry should be out there publicly refuting this assertion. In fact, today’s passenger levels are already significantly higher than when the business case for HS2 was approved, and have been growing back strongly since the pandemic.
“In the last six months, passenger numbers have been averaging 96 per cent of pre-Covid levels, despite strikes and poor service levels on some parts of the network.
“In short, passengers have been returning in droves around the country and there is no evidence this trend upwards will not continue in future. With a growing population, and a generally agreed need to level-up and decarbonise, now is clearly not the time for the government to be scrapping major project like HS2 Phase 2 – the main benefit of the scheme being it frees up much-needed capacity on the West Coast, Midlands and East Coast Mainlines for the increasing numbers of passengers we are going to see in the years ahead.”
IFS director Paul Johnson: Chaos around HS2 makes me ‘want to weep’
Paul Johnson has said the chaos around HS2 makes him “want to weep” and the end result will be a “total waste" of money, Archie Mitchell reports.
The influential economist said he did not support the high speed rail project initially, claiming it was “going to be hugely expensive with relatively little gain”.
Mr Johnson told Times Radio: “It makes me want to weep, it just makes me despair.
“The original sin, as it were, was agreeing to do it in the first place. It was obviously going to be hugely expensive, with relatively little gain from it relative to pretty much anything else you could have done with the railway or transport system, whether that’s making rail connections across the north vastly better or actually building a bunch of bypasses and improving the roundabouts in the road network.
“And we knew that, that this was not the best way you could spend that amount of money. We also know how difficult we find it to build these projects."
Mr Johnson added: "It rather looks like we’re going to totally waste the money on this in producing a rail at the cost of tens of billions, which will get you from Birmingham to central London less quickly than you can do at the moment."
Shapps says HS2 cannot have ‘open-ended cheque’ as Sunak set to wield axe
It would be “irresponsible” to keep ploughing money into the HS2 project in the face of rising costs, a cabinet minister said as Rishi Sunak considered scrapping the route from Birmingham to Manchester.
Former transport secretary Grant Shapps said the scheme risked sucking up money which could be used on other local projects as ministers considered the future of the project.
Mr Shapps said the government could not write an “open-ended cheque” if costs were “inexorably going higher and higher”.
David Hughes reports:
Shapps says HS2 cannot have ‘open-ended cheque’ as Sunak set to wield axe
The leg of HS2 from Birmingham to Manchester is in doubt because of spiralling costs.
How The Independent revealed Sunak’s plan to cut HS2 - and how the government reacted
On Wednesday 13 September, TheIndependent revealed top-level talks were taking place between Rishi Sunak and Jeremy Hunt about whether to scrap parts of the high-speed rail project HS2.
The much-delayed and overbudget scheme is for a rail line linking some of the country’s largest cities, intended to connect London, the Midlands and the north of England, with construction split into three phases.
Downing Street was evasive when approached for comment – but refused to deny discussions were taking place. Our story even appeared to be news to HS2’s project managers, as well as the Department for Transport.
Read the full report:
How The Independent revealed Sunak’s plan to cut HS2 - and how the government reacted
The Independent’s revelations about HS2 rocked Westminster
Watch: Burnham’s plea to Sunak on HS2
Andy Burnham has urged Rishi Sunak to avoid scrapping HS2, warning that the decision would leave the north of England with “Victorian infrastructure”.
Speaking on Monday morning (25 September), the mayor of Greater Manchester questioned why those living in the region are treated as “second-class citizens”.
“We need new north-south rail lines and we need new east-west rail lines, London has never been forced to choose between those two things,” Mr Burnham said.
“London gets everything. Why should we always be forced to choose? Why should the public here always be treated as second-class citizens?”
Watch the clip here:
Burnham makes HS2 plea to Sunak: ‘Why should we be treated as second-class citizens?’
Andy Burnham has urged Rishi Sunak to avoid scrapping HS2, warning that the decision would leave the north of England with “Victorian infrastructure”. Speaking on Monday morning (25 September), the mayor of Greater Manchester questioned why those living in the region are treated as “second-class citizens”. “We need new north-south rail lines and we need new east-west rail lines, London has never been forced to choose between those two things,” Mr Burnham said. “London gets everything. Why should we always be forced to choose? Why should the public here always be treated as second-class citizens?”
HS2: Timeline of the key events
HS2 has suffered a number of delays since the government decided to press ahead with the project more than a decade ago.
The high-speed rail network, designed to better connect London and the southeast to the north, has also faced a number of legal challenges.
It has been a controversial project since plans to build it first emerged in 2009 under the then Labour government.
Below is a timeline of the key events:
No 10 declines to comment on future of HS2
Downing Street is still declining to comment on the future of HS2 after The Independent revealed that Rishi Sunak and the chancellor are considering scrapping the northern leg between Birmingham and Manchester.
The prime minister spoke to reporters earlier while on a visit to Hertfordshire and declined to give his backing to the project while insisting he was committed to levelling up.
His official spokesman has also repeatedly declined to comment on what the PM earlier described as “speculation” about the future of the project.
The spokesman said that the government would continue to have a “good record” on levelling up, amid anger in northern England over the renewed uncertainty over the fate of the rail project.
“Without getting into a specific project, I think the government has and will continue to have a good record about levelling up and driving growth in the north,” the spokesman said.
Gordon Brown: Giving up on HS2 will cause ‘confusion and chaos’
Gordon Brown has said giving up on HS2 would cause “confusion and chaos” - especially for Manchester and the rest of the north of England, Archie Mitchell reports.
The former prime minister said it is “very sad” politicians cannot agree to build “basic infrastructure” such as the northern link of the high speed rail network.
And he said Britain is in danger of being stuck with “19th century solutions to 21st century problems”.
Mr Brown told LBC: “Every country in Europe is doing high speed rail. It’s becoming the norm rather than the exception, and Britain is in danger of having 19th century solutions to 21st century problems.
“If you embark on a big infrastructure project, you cause confusion and chaos, particularly for Manchester and for the areas in the north, where they also want east/west links as well as north/south links, if you just give up on a project halfway through it.
“ It does not make sense for us to give up all the work that has been done. But again, there should be an all-party consensus on this. This is long term infrastructure, irrespective of which party is in power, which party actually exists.
“We’re talking about a future 50 years ahead. And we’ve got to really plan that on the basis that we can get some agreement between the parties.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments