Council approves sound-recording CCTV to tackle antisocial behaviour
Uttlesford District Council has passed a new CCTV policy which includes the potential for audio surveillance - but is accused of ‘bringing Orwell’s Big Brother to Essex’
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A borough council has passed a policy that will allow it to install security cameras that can record sound in a bid to tackle antisocial behavior.
The move by Uttlesford District Council in Essex could see audio surveillance introduced to CCTV on council-owned or managed residential buildings and gardens, as well as offices and vehicles.
The sound-recording devices form part of the council’s objectives to deter antisocial behavior and catch criminals.
A council spokesperson told The Independent there were not yet plans in place for such a device, but that the policy, passed by the council’s cabinet last week, allowed it to do so in the future.
But a spokesperson for campaign group Big Brother Watch criticised the council, claiming it had voted to “bring Orwell’s Big Brother to Essex”.
They added: “Rather than make residents feel safer, this will make many feel like someone is looking over their shoulder. The council should do more to protect residents’ right to privacy and rethink these intrusive plans.”
The council’s newly-implemented CCTV policy states that audio surveillance would not be used for general observation.
Signs would be put up to make clear whena recording is taking place, though the devices could be hidden in covery operations.
And before installing new cameras in housing estates or communal areas, residents would be written to, the council’s policy said.
Audio, like images, would be held for 31 days unless it was needed for an ongoing antisocial behaviour case.
Speaking at the cabinet meeting when the policy was passed, councillor Neil Reeve said: “This is for CCTV cameras on our own facilities including in relation to our housing stock and I think that is very sound, and the policies within that are very sound and I support those.
He added: “For what this is, I think it is fit for purpose.”
The council states within its CCTV policy: “Our intention is to balance the privacy rights of individuals with our responsibilities to prevent and detect crime and/or anti-social behaviour.
“We will ensure the use of CCTV is proportionate to the impact of crime and anti-social behaviour individuals and communities.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments