Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Habgood rejects Prime Minister's views on crime

Andrew Brown,Terry Kirby
Monday 01 March 1993 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE ARCHBISHOP of York, Dr John Habgood, yesterday said John Major had been unwise to say society should condemn rather than understand when dealing with criminal behaviour.

In direct contradiction of the Prime Minister's comments last weekend, Dr Habgood told David Frost, on the Breakfast with Frost programme on BBC-TV, that the Government should attempt to understand the root causes of crime.

Some of it arose out of 'boredom and hopelessness' among those who felt they had no stake in society, he said. He criticised the Government for encouraging a competitive instinct in society.

The Archbishop's intervention, coming at the beginning of a week in which Kenneth Clarke, the Home Secretary, will publish a consultation paper on plans for juvenile offenders, will intensify the debate over offending. On Friday, MPs will debate crime.

Labour also argued yesterday that social conditions play their part in creating crime. Speaking on ITV's Walden programme, Tony Blair, the shadow Home Secretary, said people were more likely to commit offences if they had poor education, few employment opportunities and little hope or stake in society.

Michael Howard, the Environment Secretary, also interviewed by Frost, defended Mr Major and said the Government was doing a great deal to improve conditions in the inner cities: 'You have to confront crime, and you have to confront criminals.'

Dr Habgood said: 'One has to condemn crime: one also has to understand it, because the only long-term way of stopping people being criminals is to understand why they are criminals. There is a streak of badness in everyone.

'I'm not saying that people aren't bad, but often the badness is brought out of them by circumstances, by upbringing, by the sense of boredom, by a sense of hopelessness.'

Some crime, he said, arose from people feeling they had no stake in society. He rejected any direct link between crime and unemployment because criminality was not confined to the unemployed and poor. Dr Habgood went on: 'The Government, with its strong emphasis on competitive success, feeds the notion that in our society, in a sense, we are against each other and one does need some countervailing forces to show that actually true human life is about co-operation.'

He also suggested that better plans were needed to deal with unemployment.

'You have got enormous numbers of people who are paid for doing nothing, and you have an enormous amount to be done in terms of repairing the social and physical fabric of the nation,' he said.

Conservative MPs later criticised Dr Habgood. Graham Riddick, MP for Colne Valley, said he lacked the courage to tackle difficult moral issues and took the easy option of attacking the Government.

'One of the biggest problems facing society is the number of children and teenagers brought up without the restraining and disciplining figure of a father.'

'Many of those youngsters get into crime. Why doesn't the Archbishop pronounce that it is wrong to have children out of wedlock?' he said.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in