Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

War of words over revamp of 'Sunday Telegraph'

Chief Reporter,Terry Kirby
Saturday 29 July 2006 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A war of words has broken out between the sacked editor of The Sunday Telegraph and her former colleagues, who she has accused of "strangling at birth" her attempts to revamp the newspaper.

Sarah Sands, who has not commented publicly since she left the paper in March - after an unsuccessful redesign - is now said to have accused executives at the Telegraph group of attempting to "trash her reputation''.

In a letter to GQ, she tells of the tensions that lay behind her departure and defends her efforts, stressing the newspaper's circulation was higher when she left than when she started.

Her letter, expected to be published in the October edition of GQ, is in response to an interview in the magazine in which Andrew Neil, the former Sunday Times editor - now a senior executive for the Telegraph group owners, the Barclay brothers - said drastic action had been needed "or the whole franchise would be destroyed'.'

Mr Neil, chief executive of the part of the Barclays' empire that includes The Business and The Spectator, but who was not involved in the hiring or firing of Ms Sands, told the magazine: "I have always favoured change, But this [the redesign] just seemed to be completely wrong, from the use of unjustified type even on news stories to the kind of hug-a-tree features. It just didn't seem to be what The Sunday Telegraph was about.''

He added: "I have made mistakes in appointing editors and when you do, the best thing to do is to draw a line under it and say 'I'm sorry, my fault, its over'.''

Ms Sands left the paper after John Bryant was appointed as editor-in-chief above her head.

At that time, the paper was selling 683,740 a week, compared with 666,031 before she was appointed in May 2005. Under her editorship, The Sunday Telegraph, always an upholder of traditional, Conservative values, with an older readership profile, became a more "feminine" paper, with a softer tone to its appearance. The colour magazine was replaced with Stella, devoted to fashion and beauty, and Seven, covering cultural matters.

She is quoted as saying in the letter: "I was removed because I was not to the taste of men such as Andrew Neil but he has no right to trash my reputation.''

She adds: "Mr Neil claims that I had to be removed before I destroyed the franchise. That is odd. I spent 11 years at The Daily Telegraph visibly growing the franchise, especially on a Saturday. It may suit Andrew Neil's purposes to create a myth about my Sunday editorship, but I should remind him circulation was higher when I left than when I started.''

Ms Sands admits that some elderly readers had been upset by her changes but she believed many new readers had been delighted by the "originality and energy and wit" they found and had been sorry to see the project "strangled at birth".

The "hug-a-tree" features, Ms Sands suggests, were "beautifully written examinations of the human condition".

A tale of two editors

SARAH SANDS

Style: Fragrant editress

Most likely to commission: An in-depth survey of global trends in scented candles, written by a fashion writer

Politics: Hardcore Cameronite

Most likely to say: "Reading my new magazine will be like sinking yourself into a warm bubble bath ...''

ANDREW NEIL

Style: Crinkly-haired, pugnacious newspaper executive, all-purpose commentator and occasional boulevardier

Most likely to commission: An in-depth analysis of global economic trends, written by a respected commentator

Politics: Thatcherite to the core.

Most likely to say: "Yes, Sir David; No, Sir Frederick ...''

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in