Girls encouraged to ‘do science’ rather than be scientists more likely to engage with the subject
A change in language could help address the gender disparity in Stem subjects
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Getting more young girls interested in science from a young age has long been a goal of the education system. Now a new study shows that a small tweak in wording could make all the difference.
According to researchers, asking girls to “do science” rather than “be scientists” increases their engagement and persistence with the subject.
The psychology study was conducted by researchers at New York University and Princeton University, who carried out four studies with children aged four to nine years old.
They found that children who are the targets of stereotypes suggesting they wouldn’t be good at science, focusing on the action, rather than the identity, led to more positive results.
"The roots of gender disparities in science achievement take hold in early childhood," said Marjorie Rhodes, an associate professor in NYU's department of psychology and the senior author of the study. "This research identifies an element of children's environments that could be targeted to reduce early gender differences in science behavior among young children."
As part of their research, the authors analysed children’s television shows and found that popular programmes refer to scientists as a kind of person more often than they refer to science as an activity that people do, which can deter young girls from feeling confident in their abilities.
The study, which appears in the journal Psychological Science, follows on from similar research undertaken by Rhodes and her colleagues last year, which showed that asking children "to help" instead of to "be helpers," led to more pro-social helping behavior.
The findings could help get more women interested in science from a young age, which is crucial in addressing the gender imbalance in the field.
According to figures from Wise Campaign, in 2017 women made up 23 per cent of those in core science, technology, engineering and maths (Stem) occupations in the UK.
A report from the Institute of Fiscal Studies last year showed that while girls perform similarly to boys in science GCSEs, they then avoid taking them at A-levels. Among those who achieved grade A or A* in GCSE physics, for example, just 13 per cent of girls compared to 39 per cent of boys took physics A-level.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments