Adani Group official says stock con allegations like ‘colonial era massacre’ after $72bn rout

Hindenburg says ‘fraud is fraud, even when it’s perpetrated by one of the wealthiest individuals in the world’

Maroosha Muzaffar
Monday 30 January 2023 12:06 GMT
Comments
FILE- Adani group Chairman Gautam Adani speaks during the inauguration of the 9th Vibrant Gujarat Global Summit in Gandhinagar, India, 18 January 2019
FILE- Adani group Chairman Gautam Adani speaks during the inauguration of the 9th Vibrant Gujarat Global Summit in Gandhinagar, India, 18 January 2019 (Associated Press)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Jugeshinder Singh, the chief finance officer (CFO) of India’s Adani Group, has compared the conglomerate’s stocks rout after US-based Hindenburg Research’s damning report with one of India’s worst British colonial era massacre.

Mr Singh compared the behaviour of Indian investors participating in the sell-off to the Jallianwala Bagh massacre that took place in Amritsar city in Punjab in 1919.

After the US-based short seller’s investigation titled “Adani Group: How the World’s 3rd Richest Man is Pulling the Largest Con in Corporate History” was published, investors began dumping Adani-linked shares, wiping out some $72bn in market value so far.

In an interview with the Indian business daily Mint, Mr Singh was asked why the market believed the Hindenburg report. He responded: “In Jallianwala Bagh, only one Englishman gave an order, and Indians fired on other Indians. So am I surprised by the behaviour of some fellow Indians? No.”

At least 379 people were killed in the Jallianwala Bagh massacre, according to official records. But locals claim the toll was far higher.

The conglomerate issued a rebuttal, calling the short seller’s report “malicious”, “baseless” and full of “selective misinformation”. Hindenburg accused the Adani group of engaging in “brazen” stock manipulation and accounting fraud.

“We have uncovered evidence of brazen accounting fraud, stock manipulation and money laundering at Adani, taking place over the course of decades. Adani has pulled off this gargantuan feat with the help of enablers in government and a cottage industry of international companies that facilitate these activities,” the report said.

Adani Group said it was considering “remedial and punitive” legal action against Hindenburg Research.

Adani’s 400-page rebuttal issued late Sunday accused Hindenburg of attacking India and its institutions and of breaking securities and foreign exchange laws. Adani Group also accused Hindenburg of trying to derail a share sale originally expected to bring in about $2.5bn.

The group said it had complied with all laws and made the necessary regulatory disclosures. “All transactions entered into by us with entities who qualify as ‘related parties’ under Indian laws and accounting standards have been duly disclosed by us,” it said in a statement.

“This is not merely an unwarranted attack on any specific company but a calculated attack on India, the independence, integrity and quality of Indian institutions, and the growth story and ambition of India,” Adani’s statement added.

Hindenburg, in response, denied the accusations and said that Adani Group’s response failed to address key questions and attempted to “conflate its meteoric rise and the wealth of its chairman … with the success of India itself”.

Hindenburg said that Adani Group was trying to “lead the focus away from substantive issues and instead stoked a nationalist narrative”.

It added: “We believe India is a vibrant democracy and emerging superpower with an exciting future. We also believe India’s future is being held back by the Adani Group, which has draped itself in the Indian flag while systematically looting the nation. We also believe that fraud is fraud, even when it’s perpetrated by one of the wealthiest individuals in the world.”

On Sunday, the standoff between Hindenburg and Adani Group continued with Adani claiming that the US short sellers were the “Madoffs of Manhattan” – referring to American fraudster and financier Bernard Lawrence Madoff, the mastermind of the largest Ponzi scheme in history.

Hindenburg retorted: “Adani seems unaware that Madoff lived in Manhattan, so he was quite literally his own Madoff of Manhattan.”

“In terms of substance, Adani’s ‘413 page’ response only included about 30 pages focused on issues related to our report,” Hindenburg continued in its statement. “The remainder of the response consisted of 330 pages of court records, along with 53 pages of high-level financials, general information, and details on irrelevant corporate initiatives, such as how it encourages female entrepreneurship and the production of safe vegetables.”

Billionaire US investor Bill Ackman said on Thursday that he found Hindenburg Research’s report on Adani Group “highly credible and extremely well researched”.

Hindenburg Research has said that it stands by its investigation and welcomes any legal action.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in