WORDS : Solidarity

Sunday 19 March 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

LABOUR'S new Clause IV has been charged with wordiness, even of jargonising; in particular, its sonorous phrase "a spirit of solidarity, tolerance and respect" has come in for criticism. This is unfair. Professor Bernard Crick wrote in the Guardian that Tony Blair and his co-draftsmen had put "solidarity" to appease the feminists, otherwise they would have made it "fraternity", as in the rallying cry of revolutionary France. But that was not the echo Mr Blair was after, any more than the grand old English brotherhood with its reminder of generations of Labour Party conferences and TUCs. What was needed was something that would awake loyal sentiments in the maximum number of breasts, even if they nursed slightly divergent ideas of what it meant.

Solidarity was just the ticket. Old Socialists would glow with the memory of battles waged by the workers against an exploitative capitalist class. But others would think, not of confrontation between one section of society and another, but of that broader sense of the word which it had when we got it from the French, and which preoccupied French political reformers 100 years ago when people were having second thoughts about the philosophy of the Revolution. La solidarit, said President Loubet in 1900, was "the great common inspiration of the day". Its motto was "every man his neighbour's debtor", one of Loubet's ministers claiming for it "the secret for the material and moral grandeur of society". Mr Blair himself could not have put it better.

A correspondent in the Independent complained: "All I could see was a string of jargon phrases". Jargon is deplorable when it is designed to divide those who understand it from those who do not. But Mr Blair's aim was not to divide but to unite. Has he done a fudge? If so, he is hardly alone among politicians.

Nicholas Bagnall

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in