Words: Red Tape

Nicholas Bagnall
Sunday 21 November 1993 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE PROMISED Deregulation Bill will doubtless bring with it much high talk about the spirit of free enterprise that has made our country great. We have heard these sentiments before. What gives edge to the message this time is that trusty old metaphor in the War of the Slogans: red tape.

The expression free enterprise is an unreliable weapon that might backfire, and words like deregulation find no echoes in the breast. Who could win a campaign with such cumbersome equipment? Red tape, on the other hand, takes us straight into the enemy's territory. The nation can happily unite over it, because we all hate it - as people must have done ever since lawyers and their like started tying unreadable documents in it about 300 years ago, though it was not until the 1830s, if one goes by the OED, that it became a synonym for bumbledom and obstruction.

This does not mean that the Government is against red tape. Not at all. It has itself unreeled a great deal of it to restrain teachers from using their judgement about what they should teach; and there are no immediate plans to undo it. But then ministers call it something else. They call it accountability, which puts a different complexion on the matter, though the tape stays in place.

Humpty Dumpty's technique (when he used a word, he told Alice, it meant what he chose it to mean) is often cited when people discuss totalitarian regimes, where democracy, for example, means one thing in one country, another in another. In true democracies we reverse the procedure. The thing described remains the same: the word used to describe it changes. A man may be called a patriot one day and a chauvinist the next, but he is still the same man.

Fairly harmless by Orwellian standards. But poor George Orwell, that scourge of the weasels, has also had his name misused before now. If a parliamentary candidate dislikes his or her opponents' choice of slogans, he may well accuse them of being Orwellist. I'd call that plain Humptyism.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in