Words: Offensive

Nicholas Bagnall
Saturday 29 April 1995 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Offensive

MOST dual-purpose words, such as wicked, depend for their meaning on who happens to be using them: bad when spoken by parsons, good when spoken by pagan teenagers, say. is different. It more often does a quick-change act by going into another part of speech. Ken Livingstone used the adjective to some effect in the House when he accused Bernard Manning, the bad-taste comedian, of having been offensive about black people (he had called them niggers). Use it as a noun and there is no reproach, rather the reverse. A war leader who fails to mount one could be ready for his pension.

It wasn't till the 18th century that people made a noun of it and began talking about being "on the offensive". The adjective came first, having been taken from defendere, to strike, which didn't necessarily imply aggression (defendere was also the word Romans used when they stubbed a toe). But then it rapidly got a metaphorical meaning too, as it had in Latin, and became more and more disapproving.

Anyway, for some 150 years the adjective had always done for either meaning - the neutral one, which was simply the opposite of defensive, and the one we now find it so easy to associate with Bernard Manning; and it can still be ambiguous. What, for example, is meant when someone mentions an offensive footballer? Is he a good striker, or has he been rude to the referee again (both, perhaps)?

In his reply to Ken Livingstone, John Major preferred not to use the word, observing instead: "I certainly think that everybody should avoid expressions that give offence to those who are on the receiving end." This was rather craven of him. Being offensive is a great deal more unpleasant than merely giving offence.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in