Words: Nasty

Nicholas Bagnall
Saturday 16 April 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE EXPRESSION video nasty has not yet reached the statute book, but it has got well beyond being just a headline tag, and can be found, though sometimes in inverted commas, in the news columns of respectable dailies. This is rather odd, because nasty used to be a feeble word, first-class for a passing insult ('You've got a nasty mind') but without much bite. No one 50 years ago would have thought it adequate for the films whose bad influence on the young has been troubling MPs.

Children enjoyed using the word, particularly about food such as tapioca or bread-and-butter pudding. Some of them could recite with glee the rhyme they had learned from their grandparents:

'Mama, what is that nasty mess that looks like strawberry jam?'

'Hush, darlings, that is dear papa, run over by a tram.'

In short, nasty was a nursery word. It wasn't much helped by Stella Gibbons's satirical Cold Comfort Farm, in which seeing 'something n-a-a-a-sty in the woodshed' had unbalanced one of the Starkadders for life. However obscene the nameless thing, it was hard to take nasty too seriously after that.

Until the 1980s video nasties were called 'horror videos'. Horror had a long and useful record. Why the change? The word had certainly been overused by the tabloids; but I think it was really because by then horror had come increasingly to be reserved for films about Count Dracula, Frankenstein's monster and so on, which, compared with more recent material, were mere fairy-tales. Retailers might still put it all under Horror, but for the real sewage another word was needed.

The choice of nasty may have originated in the United States, where it is a stronger word than it has been here. Anyway, it has come back into its own and, in its new context, stinks just as powerfully as it did in its early days, when it implied actual filth of the smelliest sort; by the 17th century it also meant morally repulsive. We certainly need it now.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in