Words: Establishment

Nicholas Bagnall
Saturday 22 May 1999 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A CERTAIN amount of ill-feeling seems to have accompanied the appointment of Andrew Motion as the Poet Laureate. No one should be surprised at this. The compulsion to be rude about fellow-practitioners can be one of the burdens conferred by the Muse. This time, though, the Laureateship being a political appointment, anyone can join in. Complaints have been heard that Mr Motion is an establishment poet, and that the Queen's advisers had no business to recommend such a person.

I really don't see why they shouldn't. After all, it could be argued that whether Mr Motion was an establishment poet or not, he became one as soon as he got that call. But this would be too facile a view. It depends what is meant by "Establishment".

Henry Fairlie's definition of 1955 is the one now generally cited: "I do not mean only the centres of official power," he wrote in the Spectator, "though they are certainly part of it, but rather the whole matrix of official and social relations within which power is exercised." Before that the Establishment had been roughly confined to the Church, then the judiciary, the Lords and the Commons, but by the 1950s this obviously wouldn't do, since fewer and fewer people cared what bishops said, and it had long ceased to be obligatory to touch a forelock to the squire. But I'm not sure that the Fairlie definition is much help either.

The Establishment, as defined by Fairlie, now includes anyone who has an influence on the way other people think. The adjective establishment is often used as though it were rather a dirty word, which made good sense so long as everyone who was thought to belong to the Establishment had the same ideas on life, which they proceeded to dictate to the rest of us. This is no longer so.

It's not a tightly-knit body anymore. It includes pop stars, media moguls, supermodels, captains of industry, football managers, television personalities, transplant surgeons, self-appointed arbiters of taste, and spin-doctors of various stripes - a pretty heterogeneous bunch. The only thing they have in common is that they might all at one time or another expect invitations to No 10. Establishment with a capital "E" means very little. The matrix has broken up.

For the same reason, the adjective has lost any precision it might once have had. I suspect that when most people say it they merely mean "orthodox". You might even say that it's done an about-turn. The principal objection to Mr Motion, so far as one could gather, was that he was too ready to go along with received ideas, not that he imposed them on others as the old Establishment did. Some people use it as a slightly grander alternative to "fuddy-duddy," and this certainly accords with the earliest sense of the word, which simply meant the act of making - or the state of being - stable, which in turn came from the Latin stare, to stand, implying resistance to change. An established man was someone who was settled in life. Whatever we may think of Mr Motion, he is clearly an established poet, with or without the laurels.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in