Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Cant
"Publish and be damned by your cant, Polly Toynbee", shouted the headline over a Daily Telegraph piece by Barbara Amiel. Recent disagreements between Miss Toynbee and the Daily Mail (assisted by the Independent on one side and the Times on the other) had been going on nicely until then. The issue had been simple enough: was the Mail justified in snooping into Miss Toynbee's private life to find out whether it accorded with her public views? Miss Amiel very properly thought not. But that headline was a stinger.
was the Telegraph's rude word for the already much-bandied hypocrisy, and it has a good strong ring of the 18th century about it, having been famously uttered by Dr Johnson when he told Boswell to clear his mind of it. We all know the quote. But Johnson has been misunderstood here. What he said was "Clear your mind of cant", with the emphasis on "mind". Boswell shouldn't fool himself into thinking he was vexed by public affairs, he was saying. ("Public affairs vex no man.") It was perfectly all right to pretend he was, if only out of politeness. Hypocrisy is also about pretence, but of a much more discreditable kind than such mere cliche-mongering.
is more about mumbo-jumbo. It's true that even in Johnson's day the two overlapped; his own dictionary defines canter as "a term of reproach for hypocrites, who talk formally of religion without obeying it". But cant more often meant a meaningless or incomprehensible jargon. Religion came into it because cantare in Latin meant to chant, as in choirs - it was an anti-clerical remark. Then the word became associated not with cantors but with the whining of beggars, then with their private jargon, then with any sort of jargon. It certainly looks well in a headline.
Nicholas Bagnall
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments