Unionist politicians must represent the views of their electorate

David Crawford
Friday 30 May 1997 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Having been in Northern Ireland during last week's local elections, and seen local coverage and comment, I find David McKittrick's analysis curiously unbalanced.

The share of the vote was: all Unionists (including independents), 49.7 per cent; all nationalists (including independents), 38.7 per cent; Alliance Party, 6.6 per cent; others, 5 per cent. Excluding others would give the share of vote as follows: all Unionists, 52.3 per cent; all nationalists, 40.7 per cent; Alliance, 7 per cent.

All produce a roughly 60/40 split in favour of the Union. Given the widely recorded low turn-out in some Unionist areas, and allegations of electoral fraud from both Unionists and the constitutional-nationalist SDLP, this is scarcely so different from what Mr McKittrick describes as the traditional two-thirds/one-third division as to justify his dramatic language. Alliance, too, attracts Catholic voters, so diluting traditional loyalties.

This is not the first time that Belfast has had no overall control, and Mr McKittrick fails to give the whole story. Seats won were: all Unionists, 235; all nationalists, 20; Alliance, 6. As in 1979, the Alliance holds the balance and has warned that the council should not be described as "nationalist-controlled". Not quite so headline-grabbing, perhaps?

Finally, one does not have to share the views of the Rev Ian Paisley to feel that it may be a bit premature to write off his Democratic Unionists, when they have succeeded in electing both the youngest councillor in the province (21-year-old David Gilmore in Ards West) and a thalidomide victim (Kim Morton in Castlereagh East).

DAVID CRAWFORD

Bromley, Kent

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in