True Gripes: Shake in the grass: Private pleasures should not be public

Juliet King-Smith
Tuesday 12 July 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Oh, how I wish the sunlovers who have popped up all over the place would do their loving out of the sun. I know sumer is icumen in and all that, but do they have to, in public?

My local park in south London has been liberally sprinkled these past few weeks with the octopoid ones, their myriad limbs freely wound round one another, their mouths and hands busy, absorbed in the timeless rituals of the besotted. They seem oblivious to the old ladies enjoying the sunshine, the children on their tricycles, the middle-aged dog walkers like me.

The other I passed a typical sun-loving couple. They were positioned on what resembles the stage of a natural amphitheatre: a smooth, grassy slope easily viewed over a large area. I tried not to look as I strode by, but it was hard to ignore the whispers, the giggles and shrieks, the constant rolling over one another.

I have no objection, moral or aesthetic, to the al fresco love-making or near love-making; I just wonder why it has to be so blatant. What are the sociological implications?

In my younger days we used to find a lonely bush, a secret hollow, a cornfield far from prying eyes. Aah, I remember a pine forest in Norway. . . prickly it's true, but private. Now the aim seems to be 'what can we get away with on the grass near the bandstand?'

Are you auditioning, dear sun-lovers? Is this a competition and, if so, can anyone join in? Are you just common or garden exhibitionists or do you simply not care if anyone notices those rather, er, familiar movements you are making?

I have to say I have had fun imagining at what point your un-English insouciance, presumably heatwave induced, would turn to indignation. Would it only be if your antics attracted a substantial and spellbound crowd of gawpers? ('Oh, I am sorry. Private, you say? I thought perhaps they had got you in when the Punch and Judy show had to cancel. No, no, Henry, hurry up please. Marcus] Come away from the man and lady. . .')

Well, it will be over soon. Come September, you lovers will have to leave the haven of the park and take your sensual pleasures unobserved, exchanging fresh, cool grass for squeaky bedsprings. Meanwhile, find a bush, mush.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in