The public and parliamentary view of fox hunting has shifted
Now, in midwinter, it is evident that any attempt to repeal or weaken the law will be futile
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.In midsummer, it became clear that David Cameron’s attempts to reignite the debate over fox hunting – with the amendment of crucial elements of the legislation potentially leading to repeal of the ban on hunting with dogs by the backdoor – had been dealt a devastating blow. The SNP, newly elected as a significant force in Westminster, confirmed that it would break convention and vote with Labour on a matter that affects only England to ensure that the ban remained in place. Now, in midwinter, it is evident that any attempt to repeal or weaken the law will be futile.
This newspaper has always recognised that there were flaws in the legislation to ban this cruel sport when it was first introduced by Tony Blair’s government in 2004, and accepted that, at the time, it faced widespread opposition. In the intervening period, however, attitudes have fundamentally changed.
Polling data from Ipsos Mori shows that members of the public, in rural as well as urban areas, overwhelmingly state that fox hunting should not be legalised again, and further studies from YouGov conclude that all regions of Britain now support the ban.
The views of politicians, including those on the right, have followed a similar trajectory. As we report today, new research suggests 50 Conservative MPs are publicly committed to joining Labour and the SNP in opposing any amendments to the Act tabled by Cameron’s Government. More may privately share those views. That is compared to just six Tory MPs a decade ago when the issue was first being debated in the Commons.
There is not sufficient appetite for change, among the people or among their representatives, to justify spending any more parliamentary time on the fox-hunting debate. Any vote on the issue would, we now know, be lost by the Government. The ban should stand, and Mr Cameron should move on to the myriad urgent matters with a better claim to his attention.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments