The Government must take responsibility for the elderly
Councils will now be able to charge households up to 4 per cent extra council tax with the additional funds to be spent only on social care - but there won't be much to show for it
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Under the guise of its commitment to local democracy, the Government is abdicating its national responsibilities. No single issue could be more critical to the health and well-being of a nation than the care and support of its older people. But now the matter is being left in the hands of under-funded local councils, already buckling under cuts to their income, and they are unable to cope.
As a result of an ageing population, rising longevity and a growing number of people living with serious health conditions such as dementia, demand for care is rising. Provision is not meeting that growing need.
According to the Health and Social Care Information Service, of the 1.8 million people whose requests for care and support were assessed by English councils in 2014-15, 59 per cent received no direct services. This is a situation that must be tackled.
In November’s Spending Review, the Chancellor announced a “social care precept” to be added to council tax bills. It allowed councils to charge households up to 2 per cent extra, with the additional funds to be spent only on social care. Now a survey of councils has revealed that nine out of 10 will levy the charge – on top of the additional 2 per cent annual rise that all local authorities are free to implement – so the vast majority of UK households should now anticipate a 4 per cent council tax rise this year.
But, when it comes to social care, there will be little to show for it. The vast majority of the extra funding the precept will raise, a combined £372m, will be spent covering the cost of introducing the Government’s national living wage to the care sector. That is a welcome policy, in itself, but the precept intended to help tackle the care crisis will in fact be siphoned off, leaving little for care.
Meanwhile, in some areas – Ealing, Hammersmith and Stoke-on-Trent, for example – the social care precept will not be charged at all. The care of our nation’s sick, old and disabled should not be a political game; tough decisions like these should not be passed down to ill-equipped and cash-strapped local representatives.
The social care precept is a sticking plaster that leaves the wound still exposed; a cure for the illness that caused it has yet to be found.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments