street talk / procrastination

Louis Palabrota
Tuesday 13 June 1995 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

First things first and fair's fair, the long and the short of it is that I have given this inquiry the fullest and most precise answers to the best of my ability. As we know, the truth in such matters is as broad as it's long; we have to take it as it comes and not run hither and thither after what may not amount to a hill of beans.

Tittle tattle aside, as far as I can tell, and certainly as near as makes no difference, this government did not condone the sale of thingamebobs to old wotsisname in Iraq, nor license the export of any dohickey or widget that may have been of use in a sort of military whojameflip. Nor, as near as dammit, and allowing for a little give and take on both sides, were we aware at that time that President Whosit was such a so-and-so, but believed that, as these things go, he was more or less fair to middling, and if not exactly a good sort, was neither fish nor fowl.

Be that as it may, I resent the insinuation that I did not know if I was coming or going in these negotiations and that I ran here, there and everywhere like some flibbertegibbet who doesn't know his arse from a hole in the ground, or that come what may, I would as needs must turn a blind eye to the sale of some sort of dufus or some such to the Iraqi whatnot.

I was constantly on the go ensuring that relations with both sides were, following the rule of thumb, so-so, and that they remained more or less much of a muchness. Hogwash notwithstanding, things were not bad, though not as good as it gets, but far be it from me to say that sooner or later it was more than likely that someone would claim we were letting things take their course on the basis that a nod's as good as a wink to a blind horse and that, even if it was a bit piss-and-make- do, it was better than nothing.

As it happens I was the minister responsible and, when push comes to shove, must stand up and be counted, but at the end of the day the record will show that I had doodly squat to do with any of this and that is why I have given this inquiry my full and frank support, unreservedly and unstintingly, and so on.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in