So, let's bid farewell to 2016's most annoying and overused word
'So, we undertook this research and we discovered the following...'
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
Goodbye to 2016 and hopefully we can bid good riddance to the most annoying word in the English language, a short tag which serves absolutely no function except to illustrate the linguistic shortcomings of the speaker in question.
I refer to the word "so" used at the beginning of a sentence, as in, "So, the government has decided...", or "So, we undertook this research and discovered the following…."
In the past year, "so" dumped at the start of any sentence has become a blight which now afflicts politicians, official spokespeople, news reporters and social commentators. Not to mention all people under the age of 40 discussing anything from shopping to sports results. In any one day I reckon you will hear a redundant "so" many thousands of times, replacing "to be honest" or "like" and "it is what it is" as the most annoying verbal tic ever.
This inappropriate and superfluous use of "so" is said to have been started by inarticulate Silicon Valley techies, more used to tapping keyboards than holding meaningful face-to-face conversations. Back in 2014, Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg managed to use the word "so’" FOUR times in one answer during an interview with the New York Times. Techies use the word to buy time and pretend that they are filling us in with a detailed explanation and including us in their world, whereas the opposite is generally true.
Some academics claim that so is a sign our language is becoming friendlier, but I disagree. "So" signals that our vocabulary is inexorably shrinking and become threadbare.
The only positive thing you can say about Donald Trump is that he speaks in short sentences, rarely using words of more than two syllables at a time. He is too old to have been afflicted by the So Bug. In 2017, please try to wean yourself off the S-word.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments