Redrawing of parliamentary boundaries is not the issue

It is both fair and proper, in democratic terms, to update boundaries to represent a changing population

Friday 12 February 2016 23:22 GMT
Comments
The likelihood of a Tory rebellion over the issue, which is prompting a rethink on the cuts, demonstrates the breadth of concern about its effects.
The likelihood of a Tory rebellion over the issue, which is prompting a rethink on the cuts, demonstrates the breadth of concern about its effects. (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

There are many reasons to worry about the Conservative Party’s apparent attempts to take control of the parliamentary process. A proposed cut to Short money, funding provided to the opposition party to cover its costs and operate effectively, is one. It would mean that the Tories – the better-funded party – could hobble an already-weakened Labour Party by enforcing a financial inequality between Government and Opposition.

The likelihood of a Tory rebellion over the issue, which is prompting a rethink on the cuts, demonstrates the breadth of concern about its effects. Whatever its merits in terms of liberalism, the forcing through of changes to trade-union rules – meaning members must “opt in” to rather than “opt out” of paying a levy to Labour – is another, given the chilling effect it will have on funding for the Opposition.

Yet the matter that is drawing criticism for the Conservative Party this week, that of changes to constituency boundaries, seems the least deserving of attention. It is both fair and proper, in democratic terms, to update boundaries to represent a changing population.

A review is long overdue. It is also right to consider reducing the number of MPs as it cuts costs. Labour worries it will be penalised by fewer constituencies, but many Tory MPs may also find themselves chopped out.

Graham Allen, the former chair of the defunct Political and Constitutional Reform Committee, said the Tory Government is “trying to fix the electoral system for its own party advantage”. And he’s right that, due to individual voter registration, the boundaries are being redrawn with almost a million voters missing from the electoral register. But given that new registration system is designed to engage voters, there can be no basis for Mr Allen’s claim. There are reasons to worry about a Conservative stranglehold, but it’s for more complicated reasons than the creation of a constituency map designed to represent modern Britain.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in