Pilot Error

Words

Nicholas Bagnall
Sunday 17 November 1996 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Indian government, investigating the terrible accident near New Delhi, is trying to find out "whether there was pilot error or whether air traffic controllers were to blame", in the words of the Times report. Funny old language, ours. Why does error stick like a magnet to certain things and people but not to others? Pilots, drivers and computers attract it but not doctors, journalists or politicians, though all are equally fallible. Did you ever hear Madam Speaker refer to a Member error? Does the British Medical Council admit to a doctor error? It finds other ways of saying that a doctor has killed a patient. But one seldom reads about a mistake on the flight deck. It's pilot error. Not even a pilot error. Why didn't the Times put "whether the pilot or the air traffic controller was to blame"?

I'm not objecting to noun-twinning in general (there's no better way of saying bus stop, or health service. There is something graceless, though, about pilot error and driver error. There are others that I find irrationally irritating, and again it's odd that only certain people are involved. They include customers, visitors, passengers, readers, patients and teachers. Thus the railways provide Customer Information, newspapers make Reader Offers and stately homes direct us to the Visitor Car Park. There is also the ambiguous Patient Care. But it's teachers that have the most such combinations. We have teacher education, teacher performance and teacher assessment, which means of teachers rather than by them. We do not, on the other hand, have lawyer education or actor assessment and we have offers to shareholders, not shareholder offers.

I shall be told that it's all a matter of accepted idioms and I admit to being illogical. All the same, I'd prefer Information for Customers and Offers to Readers and Visitors' Car Park. Wouldn't you?

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in