Pharmacy price free-for-all: Letter
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Glenda Cooper's report ("Prices to fall in free-for-all at the pharmacy", 19 October) about the possible abolition of resale price maintenance contained a table titled "Big savings in store for customers". Alas, this table had no place within the arguments put forward.
It compared prices of branded products with a supermarket's own-label equivalents. However, own-label equivalents have been available for many years (in local pharmacies, too), and the potential big savings implied already exist.
The savings will come if branded products drop in price; the difference between branded and own-label goods has nothing to do with the RPM issue. If RPM does go, it will undoubtedly mean savings on branded goods - but only coppers. The implications for those who rely on pharmacy services could be far more costly.
SELWYN LEARNER
London SE1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments