Numbers

William Hartston
Saturday 16 July 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

STILL HERE? The celestial snooker in progress around Jupiter has awoken fears that life on our own planet might one day, if not this week, be potted into extinction. It's not a risk worth worrying about, say astronomers.

Meanwhile, over-protective parents are stifling the emotional development of their children by constant parental supervision because they fear their children will be kidnapped or assaulted. It's not a risk worth worrying about, say social scientists.

So when is a risk worth worrying about? The writer, John Allen Paulos, has proposed a Death Risk Index in which any activity may have its danger described by a number, defined as the logarithm of the average number of participants per death per year. The lower the number, the higher the risk.

So lightning, which kills around a dozen people each year in Britain, scores around 6.7 (a dozen deaths is about 1 in 5 million, and the logarithm of 5 million is 6.7). Bee-stings are 6.8, driving 3.7 and Russian Roulette (one game a year) at 0.8.

If one cataclysmic asteroid hits the earth every million years, that's a risk of 6.0. One child a year in Britain is killed by a stranger, which is less of a risk than bee- stings, lightning or asteroids.

Yet there is another aspect of anxiety: our ability to take preventative measures. Unable to influence bees and asteroids, we ignore them and take our chances. It would be neurotic to do otherwise. But we still hold our children's hands on the way to and from school. It's not a risk worth taking.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in