Melania Trump's plagiarism is first thing not original about the tycoon's campaign

The controversy will likely soon be overtaken – by another 

Rupert Cornwell
Washington DC
Tuesday 19 July 2016 15:46 BST
Comments
The controversy will likely soon be overtaken by another
The controversy will likely soon be overtaken by another (AP)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Whatever its failings, Donald Trump’s bid for the presidency has been nothing if not original. Until now.

The consolation is that almost certainly, allegations that his wife Melania borrowed from Michelle Obama in her speech to the Republican convention on Monday night, will quickly be forgotten.

For people who make their living with words – be they writers or politicians – accusations of plagiarism can quickly become a nightmare. Just ask Joe Biden, the current vice president, whose campaign for the 1988 Democratic nomination was torpedoed by the revelation that he had plagiarised Neil Kinnock, the then leader of the Labour Party in Britain, for a chunk of his standard campaign stump speech.




 
 (AP)

Or take Doris Kearns Goodwin, the eminent historian whose reputation and credibility took a grievous hit in 2002 when it was proven she had used sentences almost verbatim from other works for a book about the Kennedys, without citing her source. Goodwin’s stock is again high, but the incident at one point seriously threatened her career.

The plagiarism curse can strike in Europe as well. In 2011 Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg was forced to resign as Germany’s Defence Minister when it emerged he had copied parts of his doctoral thesis at Bayreuth University decades earlier. The minister admitted “severe errors of workmanship” but it was not enough to spare him.

Melania Trump’s sin seems less grave. She is not a presidential candidate, and she does not make speeches or write for a living like Goodwin. Nor does her plagiarism seem egregious – just two or three platitudinous sentences that anyone could have come up with. It is highly embarrassing to be sure, given the visceral dislike of Trump supporters for anything to do with the Obamas, and the distraction from the real point of the speech – into which the campaign had put a vast amount of effort – that her husband should appear in a fresh and softer light.

But given the lurid headlines Trump generates on a virtually daily basis, and the countless falsehoods, misrepresentations and exaggerations he peddles, it will surely be quickly overtaken by some other incident or controversy.

The real lesson is that in this computerised age, when quotations and texts can be compared in an instant by an internet search tool, plagiarism is all but impossible to conceal. Just a few hours elapsed between the delivery of the speech and the accusations that Melania Trump had copied Michelle Obama.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in