Mea Culpa: listen to reason, pivot, swivel and U-turn

Questions of usage and style in this week’s Independent

John Rentoul
Friday 18 January 2019 13:44 GMT
Comments
Let's not confuse the crescendo with the climax
Let's not confuse the crescendo with the climax (Redferns via Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

In politics, “pivot” is one of those irregular conjugations that goes something like: I listen to reason, you pivot, he/she/it swivels, they U-turn. It is enjoying a vogue in discussion of Brexit, as people suggest that Theresa May might “pivot” to a softer Brexit or that Jeremy Corbyn might “pivot” to a new referendum.

I know language changes and all that, but I think we should avoid the word in our reporting, because – despite conjuring visions of the sofa-moving scene in Friends – it implies a deft switch to a better position.

Take me to my leader: Talking of Labour pivoting to support The Independent’s campaign for another referendum, we put this headline on an article written by a Labour MEP: “Jeremy Corbyn, as my leader I implore you to back a Final Say.” That says that Julie Ward is her own leader, which makes no sense and forces the reader to pause for a moment to work out that the sentence should read: “Jeremy Corbyn, I implore you, as my leader, to back a Final Say.”

Scottish influence: In a “news in brief” item this week we reported that a “taxi driver pled guilty to driving with excess alcohol”. Two readers, John Schluter and Henry Peacock, pointed this out. Our style is “pleaded”, although I rather like the economy of the shorter word, which the Oxford dictionary describes as Scottish and North American usage.

Musical interlude: Mr Schluter also mentioned our use of “crescendo” in an editor’s letter this week, as did David Sims. We wrote: “You spend a whole day building to the crescendo of the front page.” The crescendo is the “building” bit: it’s Italian for growing (louder). The problem is that the musical term we need is “climax” and no one wants to use that these days.

Chart hit: Last week I said that the phrase “unchartered territory” was a garbled form of “uncharted territory”, forgetting that I had once had a discussion about this with Rich Greenhill and conceded that it was not clear.

As he said, “charts are nautical, so uncharted waters are unfathomed risk”, whereas unchartered referring to land used to mean lawless. He pointed me towards some references in Hansard in 1838 to “unchartered colonies”, meaning British possessions that had not been granted a royal charter and which therefore were not governed by British law.

I conclude that the only sensible thing to do is to avoid the phrase, in both forms, altogether.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in