Referendums are no way to run a country : LETTERS

Michael L. Rogers
Wednesday 14 December 1994 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Mr Michael L .Rogers Sir: So, we may soon have a referendum ("Major opens door to referendum", 13 December). Before every one applauds this change from parliamentary democracy to the Swiss model, consider what we could be letting ourselves in for.

There are many recent decisions which could arguably have been put before the people, for example: privatisations (all), enoblement of ex-prime ministers, and MPs' pay rises. There are also many other issues that groups up to mob size would no doubt propose: capital punishment, foreign ownership of the media (including newspapers), should MPs be allowed paid second jobs, immigration policy, proportional representation, should income tax be lower and so on. The point is, surely, that if you

think that such topics are too complex to be decided by the public in general, you are agreeing that the parliamentary system is better, however flawed it is at present.

Of course, the vote we really need is a simple one to pose as a referendum: should there be a general election now? Unfortunately, the evidence from the only referendum held so far is that those who disagree with the result do not accept it.

Yours faithfully, MICHAEL L. ROGERS Sevenoaks, Kent 13 December

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in