Stop demonising Qatar and enjoy the football

Letters to the editor: our readers share their views. Please send your letters to letters@independent.co.uk

On Tuesday, Saudi Arabia played magnificently and deserved its win over Argentina (AP)

The flagrant human rights transgressions in the treatment of migrant labourers and other marginalised minorities should be vociferously condemned. However, it is time to stop the demonisation of Qatar and start enjoying the football games.

On Tuesday, Saudi Arabia played magnificently and deserved its win over Argentina. Sport can make a tremendous contribution to the teaching of tolerance, social inclusivity and gender equity.

Let’s enjoy the splendour and grandeur of the World Cup and use it wisely to promote human rights worldwide.

Dr Munjed Farid Al Qutob

London

Owen Paterson’s human rights

Owen Paterson, a staunch Brexiteer who was a member of the Tories’ hardline European Research Group, once called for the UK to be “freed from the writ” of the European Convention on Human Rights. Therefore it was surprising to read that he is now seeking the ruling of the judges in courts in Strasbourg to bind the UK by the "writ" he wished us freed from.

Are we to reach the conclusion that he has now changed his mind and supports the interventions of the ECHR? We appear to be witnessing yet another of the frequent U-turns we have become accustomed to from the Tory party, though on this occasion from a former MP.

Is it possible that Mr Paterson simultaneously holds contradictory views of the role of the ECHR in the UK or is his conversion a temporary convenience consistent with the chameleon politics of his former parliamentary party?

David Nelmes  

Newport

The greed of the few

The headline on Andrew Grice’s piece from Monday reads: “The same old Tory tensions may actually kill the party.” To which I say: Good – can’t come soon enough!

The “low tax, low regulation, small state” they crave is only a dream for their cronies and donors. They want low regulation to enable them to continue exploiting the rest of the population while keeping themselves in clover.

If employers paid decent living wages, and accepted much fairer profits and perhaps less extravagant rewards for themselves, then they wouldn’t have to pay as much tax (without employing crafty accounting tricks) – a win for them. The need for benefits and support would be reduced, thereby reducing the tax take needed and the amount of dependency anyway – a win for everyone else.

Our country is not poor in any real sense, but the distribution is grossly unequal and unfair and needs adjustment. Unfortunately, at present, the power to do that lies in the greedy hands of who have most to lose from it.

Mike Margetts

Kilsby UK

No alternative under Starmer

Tony Danker, the director-general of the CBI, recently argued that migration is a positive thing. Keir Starmer’s response to Danker is to demand that the UK wean itself of what he calls its “immigration dependency”.

It is disgusting that the leader of the UK’s Labour Party is to the right of the director-general of the CBI on immigration. And this is not an isolated example.

Two weeks ago, in the aftermath of a terrorist attack on a refugee centre in Dover, Starmer argued there were too many migrants working in the NHS. Now, the reactionary Starmer is saying there are too many migrants full stop.

Anyone who is sick of the daily attacks on migrants by the Tory government will not find an alternative in Keir Starmer’s Labour Party.

Sasha Simic

London

To keep up to speed with all the latest opinions and comment, sign up to our free weekly Voices Dispatches newsletter by clicking here

School transport

I was surprised to read today that some schoolchildren were unable to afford the train fares to school. Why are they not able to attend their local school?

Surely it is up to the council to provide transport or the cost of same if they cannot accommodate all those in the catchment area.

Living in a rural area, my children attended a school with the largest number of children relying on buses in Scotland. Only those living outside the catchment area but elected to go to that school had to pay, and even then many of those qualified for free buses.

Maybe it’s different in England.

G Forward

Stirling