Militaristic boot camps don't work
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.NICK COHEN quotes from a Prison Service study which concluded that US "boot camps" did not reduce reoffending, save money or reduce prison overcrowding ("Must we copy everything American?", 19 March).
There is another striking conclusion reached by recent American research concerning the varying reconviction rates of different boot camps. The most militaristic camps with the least focus on rehabilitation had the highest reoffending rates, while those which devoted more time to education, counselling and drug treatment had less recidivism. The researchers concluded that the quasi-military aspects of boot camps made no contribution to preventing reoffending but that rehabilitative programmes could help to do so.
This is the exact opposite of the view propounded by this country's most vocal advocates.
Paul Cavadino
Penal Affairs Consortium
London SW9
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments