LETTERS: Major's bankrupt policies

John Taylor Ashford,Kent
Saturday 08 June 1996 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Commentators seem to have been much exercised recently with the idea that the Government's dispute with the European Union may enable John Major to win the next general election. The Prime Minister's obsession with selling candle wax and bull semen may not measure up to the concerns of a Palmerston, say, or Gladstone, or Churchill, but if it wins him the election, no doubt he would be satisfied.

The question which I pose is not whether Mr Major will win the election but, rather, what does he wish to win it for? In short, what would another period of Conservative government do? They would not join a European Federation but, since there is no such in existence, not joining scarcely amounts to much. Likewise they will not join a single currency, or at least, not yet, which puts them in the same position as every other member of the EU. The difference is that the others have the sense to recognise that they have an opt-out but that publicly demanding one only causes unnecessary offence.

There would be no devolution for Scotland or Wales, still less for the English regions; no elected local government for London. In fact there would be no attempt at constitutional reform. We could scarcely expect this government to take on board the exploitation of the consumer by the private utilities with their continuing effective monopolies; indeed, one of the few things they would do is sell off the last remnants of the public sector to its existing real owners. Nor could we expect any measures to tackle unemployment.

In short, like Mr Micawber, the Prime Minister would carry on, waiting for something to turn up, one bankrupt following the example of another.

John Taylor

Ashford, Kent

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in