LETTERS : How to have a say in Ireland

Mark Tottenham
Sunday 12 February 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

"IF WHAT you want for Ireland is a secular, English-speaking welfare state, what on earth was the point of independence?" Geoffrey Wheatcroft's belief that he is the first to question the purpose of Irish unity culminates in this Middle English narrow-mindedness ("Is partition still the only answer?", 5 February).

The point of independence was to give the people of Ireland some influence over their own government and not leave it to English people. Australia and Canada are probably rather relieved that they are not run from Westminster. Scotland seems now to be coming round to the same view.

One good reason why Northern Irish Protestants should join a united Ireland is that they form a fifth of the Irish population. This would yield them about 33 out of 166 TDs in the Dail, giving them much more influence over their own affairs than with the 13 out of 650 Westminster seats currently held by Unionists.

Mr Wheatcroft thinks it would be more practical to resettle the Ulster Protestant population in Britain than to unite Ireland. It would be more practical for him to find out about Ireland and its history before resorting to wild generalisations.

Mark Tottenham

London SW9

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in