LETTERS : Elusive secrets of a successful society
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I must speak out in defence of Sir James Goldsmith against some of the criticism from Nico Colchester ("Pocket guide to beating the trap", 25 January). The statement by Sir James which is the target of his criticism, reads: "The West has impo sed upon the world an obsession with economic growth, but GNP is not the true measure of the success of societies."
Mr Colchester criticises this on the grounds that the UN Human Development Index "correlates crudely but clearly with GDP per head". But this correlation might just as well be used in support of the position taken by the authors of the LTN Human Development Report. They maintain that it is things such as investment in education, literacy and health which help to cause rises in GDP. Mr Colchester, by contrast, uses this correlation to make the opposite point - that increases in GDP are necessary to improve health, education etc.
Yet Mr Colchester cannot prove that he is right rather than the authors of the UN Human Development Index. A correlation does not tell us which way the line of causation runs, and I think the statement by Sir James Goldsmith is completely valid and deserving of full support.
Yours sincerely, H. W. SINGER The Institute of Development Studies University of Sussex Brighton 26 January
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments